As the 2019 federal election drew closer, Canada’s National Observer editor-in-chief Linda Solomon Wood knew to be ready for an ugly campaign.

Disinformation had already played an enormous role in the 2016 Brexit vote and in the U.S. presidential election held the same year. Canadian authorities were issuing warnings, but no one knew how the federal vote would play out.

“It was easy to imagine Canada would be targeted next, as one of the world's leading progressive democracies,” Solomon Wood said.

“It seemed urgent to activate the power of journalism in Canada's 2019 federal election to expose disinformation and the rise of hate.”

So Solomon Wood turned to subscribers, asking them to fund a new Election Integrity Reporting Project. Canada’s National Observer would hire a reporter and analyst with the skills to expose disinformation and hate, and to pinpoint the people and factors influencing efforts to manipulate the truth.

A year later, the results of that venture ⁠— since expanded and renamed the Democracy and Integrity Project ⁠— are here. A new report, Digital Fractures, details the role disinformation campaigns played in the 2019 election and how journalists and governments worked to counter them.

“Propaganda poses a huge ongoing threat to our democracy,” Solomon Wood said.

“It’s a page-turner about one of the most critical issues of our time. It captures an important moment in Canada's history when the media came together to address a threat. It chronicles what those journalists did and shows the power of collaboration, but also, through National Observer's story, what a big difference a dedicated group of journalists can make.”

Digital Fractures was written by Caroline Orr, a social sciences scholar and disinformation expert who joined Canada's National Observer last year as a research analyst.

Canada’s National Observer tells the story of how disinformation affected the 2019 federal election, and what journalists and governments did about it. Introducing the Digital Fractures report.

The report found that although Canadian authorities did not observe major foreign efforts to disrupt the election, domestic political forces can and do use techniques from Russia’s playbook. And those methods can be used to target public conversations and opinion, even between elections.

“Bad actors can simply turn to manipulating the conversations and opinions between elections that determine their eventual outcomes,” the report says. “And there's every sign they're doing exactly that.”

The report also offers recommendations to journalists around the world who are attempting to tackle the same problem during elections in their own countries.

“I know it will be read and studied for years to come,” Solomon Wood said.

The report comes with less than a month to go until the Nov. 3 U.S. presidential election, which has brought a host of new problems surrounding disinformation. Our understanding of how to approach such problems has shifted since 2016, giving us new tools to use in the turbulent weeks ahead, Solomon Wood said.

“We know so much more today about the power of technology to spread disinformation, and how the methods for doing this grow and change faster than we can keep up with them,” she said. “We know to be on guard.”

You can download and read the full Digital Fractures report here.

Keep reading

I'd feel more confidence in this if it wasn't talking about "Russia's playbook", as if somehow even if the domestic actors referred to have nothing to do with Russia, Russia were still the major player worldwide in disinformation. Come now. It's America's playbook. The United States is and since at least WW II has continuously been the world's largest player in propaganda, both in terms of government activities such as intelligence agency disinformation, and in terms of privately funded lies and spin. From the world's biggest PR companies to ExxonMobil's propaganda groups trying to rubbish climate change, from the "National Endowment for Democracy" to corporate-funded "Tea Party" pseudo-grassroots, the US stands alone in the scale of its creation of false information.
Nobody else comes close and the couple of Russian clickbait farms everyone complains about are a drop in the bucket which is only rather lamely trying to follow the example of the masters. Talking as if Russia were the main source of distortions is itself a pretty blatant distortion.

Very important point you're making, Rufus. The U.S. and the White House itself is a disastrous disinformation machine. But in terms of the 2019 federal election, the disinformation largely came from within Canada. Are you responding to the report itself or to the article?

I noticed that the same wording is in the report itself. How you frame the story is also part of the story.