At Jacques Olivier’s Hyundai dealership in Saint-Basile Quebec, about an hour’s drive south-east of Montreal, the multiple onsite charger stations are always busy.
Three rows of shiny new EVs have been strategically parked to be visible from nearby Highway 116, with Olivier’s best sellers — including the IONIQ 5, KONA and IONIQ 6 compact SUVs — the most prominent.
Inside the dealership — one of more than 25 owned by Groupe Olivier across Quebec and New Brunswick representing a dozen manufacturers — the showroom is all EV with not a single internal combustion engine (ICE) model in sight.
EVs accounted for over 20 per cent of total sales across Groupe Olivier, with Hyundais moving faster than any other brand last year. At Saint-Basile, more than 50 percent of the vehicles sold were EVs.
For those buyers still on the fence, battery “range anxiety” remains the number one issue, Olivier said. As a result, nothing is hotter right now than plug-in hybrid vehicles.
“Those are the ones that everybody wants, because it’s the right combination of gas and electric,” Olivier told Canada’s National Observer. “All the OEMs are having problems right now supplying the demand,” he said, referring to original equipment manufacturers of components and parts for electric vehicles.

Quebec and British Columbia have been the two hotspots for EV adoption in Canada thanks to generous government rebates, but those incentives are on the wane.
The B.C. government has trimmed the number of electric and hybrid models eligible for its rebate program, and it’s unclear how much is left in its Go Electric fund.
Quebec is phasing out subsidies for new EV purchases and home charging infrastructure, including a $7000 provincial rebate for purchases of new fully electric vehicles, the richest incentive in Canada, which dropped to $4000 in January and will eventually expire.
In late 2024, Quebec consumers raced to max out on subsidies and the province saw a spike in EV sales in the final two months of the year.
The future for EV rebates – which currently do not exist in Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories – looked more bleak in January when Ottawa said it would no longer offer a federal rebate of up to $5000 on new EV purchases.
The federal program wasn’t so much a cut, officials explained, but exhausted — a victim of its own success. The demise of this incentive prompted federal NDP leader Jagmeet Singh this month to propose not only bringing it back, but doubling the maximum rebate to $10,000 if the EV is made in Canada.

New generation of EV buyers?
It’s at the car dealership — where the test drives occur, and the pros and cons of EV ownership are most closely scrutinized and considered — that EV adoption occurs.
The surprise federal announcement left many of Canada’s 3400 automobile dealerships dangerously exposed in an EV market that is already facing headwinds in spite of the growing popularity of many models.
Early adopters have already bought their EVs, leaving mainstream buyers on the fence, wary about charging infrastructure and battery range. Mass confusion over potential U.S. tariffs have also thrown the very future of Canada’s automotive industry into question, just as the COVID supply chain hangover was lifting.
“Early EV adopters have already been captured by the market,” said Charles Bernard, lead economist at the Canadian Automobile Dealers Association. “Those are the people really interested in the technology, and they were ready to absorb some of the challenges that came with buying an EV early.”
But the question remains. In the absence of federal incentives and the prospect of waning provincial subsidies, how will car dealerships — the contact point for most people who decide to buy — attract a new, more mainstream generation of EV buyers?
Dealerships occupy a critical space in the EV supply chain: they are on the front lines of EV adoption. In Canada, they include small independent businesses that work on the classic retailer model: they get inventory from a manufacturer, and represent that brand in the retail space.
There is a trend towards consolidation that has seen major players like Groupe Olivier and the Dilawri Group, Canada’s largest automotive group with 83 dealerships representing 38 automotive brands, gobble up smaller players.
But the sales model is largely unchanged. Once a vehicle is on the lot, the dealership basically owns it, and it’s up to them to move it. “As soon as it hits your lot, you're paying for it,” Bernand said of the typical dealership model. “So there's a lot of financial pressure.”
Not surprisingly, the abrupt end of federal rebates was nothing short of a crisis for many dealerships. With no advance warning, dealerships who had awarded the federal subsidy to recent EV buyers, but had not yet processed the federal rebate paperwork, were technically on the hook for the rebates. In the end, multiple auto manufacturers stepped in to cover the rebates for EVs already sold to consumers under the federal program.
Adding to the pressure to move EVs off the lot are mandates imposed by the federal government, as well as separate mandates in Quebec and B.C., to phase out ICE vehicles by requiring at least 20 per cent of new vehicle sales by 2026 to be zero-emission, rising to 100 per cent by 2035.

“Pro-EV, anti-mandates”
Bernard’s dealer group, which he says is “pro-EV, anti-mandates”, joined forces with two Canadian auto manufacturing associations in January to launch a campaign to convince Ottawa to drop their EV mandates.
This effort happened around the same time that the new Trump administration revoked an executive order by former President Joe Biden calling for half of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. to be EVs by 2030.
The gist of the anti-mandate argument in Canada is: if the federal government and provinces are lowering and eliminating subsidies to buy EVs, which come at a significant premium to ICE vehicles, how and why are manufacturers and dealers expected to hit the ambitious 2030 targets? And do it when the necessary charging infrastructure has not been built?
It's important to note that for legacy manufacturers — such as Ford, General Motors and Toyota — and many dealers alike, EVs represent a significant disruption to business as usual.
Dealerships face the potential loss of revenue from their service centers which do repairs and replace fluids for ICE vehicles. One early EV adopter told CNO that in six years of driving his EV — bought used no less — he has changed three wiper blades and the electrical coolant.
Replacing tires is one service center bright spot. Heavier EVs will go through tires faster than conventional gas vehicles. But the era of oil changes every 7000 km and a litany of other expensive moving part repairs and replacements will disappear.
And while car dealerships remain the primary interface between buyers and sellers of new cars, Tesla, North America’s biggest seller of EVs, disrupted this model.

Buyers looking for a new Tesla can book a demonstration at a “Tesla store” and buy a vehicle directly from the manufacturer, often an online purchase. Tesla owners then track service history and future routine maintenance — for air filters, tire rotation and alignment, brake fluid, and more — via their vehicle touchscreen.
When required, repairs can be scheduled with either a mobile technician, who will come to the owner, or by visiting a bricks-and-mortar Tesla Service Center, but scheduling is managed via an app.
Moving forward, researchers at consumer intelligence company JD Power have put forward ideas about how dealerships can navigate the EV disruption — and how they will need to evolve and adapt to attract new EV buyers.
“Selling EVs isn’t just about the product; it’s about understanding fundamentally different customer bases,” wrote Srini Rajagopalan, JD Power’s managing director and practice leader of automotive advisory & analytics, in Green Car Journal.
Dealerships, which have historically been focused mainly on sale transactions, need to “evolve into hubs for education and support,” he said.
Unlike many early adopters, mainstream consumers prioritize reliability, convenience and value, he wrote.
“For them, a car is a practical tool, not a project. They are accustomed to the seamless service and hassle-free experience provided by legacy automakers,” Rajagopalan said. “Mainstream buyers expect their vehicles to simply work, with minimal interruptions to their routines.”
To attract mainstream consumers, automakers will need to make significant investments in creating an EV ecosystem. “This means improving charging infrastructure, expanding service networks, and ensuring that software and hardware support systems are reliable and easy to use,” he added.
Another strategy he proposed is to target relatively affluent, two-car suburban families that already have an ICE vehicle for longer trips.

“EV Sherpa”
JD Ney, J.D. Power’s Toronto-based Director of Canadian Automotive Practice, takes the concept of a car dealership as an education-support hub a step further. Unlike the early adopter phase of EVs where customers would walk into a dealership and already be sold on the vehicle, the next generation of buyers have a lot of questions and apprehensions.
“A shopper today needs a guide, think of it like an EV Sherpa, to help them with all the new realities of being an EV owner.” That means the salesperson on the floor needs to understand the incentive landscape and how to apply, and if it’s still even an option. Do local utilities provide incentives or advice for consumers figuring out home charging? Does the dealership?
During a recent visit to an Acura dealership in Vancouver, where provincial rebates are still currently worth up to $4000, a car salesman, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said his dealership has a relationship with a company called ChargePoint, which can help buyers set up Level 2 charging in their garage. He’s not clear on the details, but can connect a new EV buyer to this company.
The lone EV model vehicle in the showroom — the ZDX SUV, a wonder of battery reliability with almost 500 km of range, has a manufacturer’s retail suggested price of $94,000 before taxes. This price tag, he added, triggers the additional BC Luxury Tax of 15 per cent.
In response to the mention of saving money with this EV from avoiding gas, he issues the following warning: “You know the $8 to $10 thousand you pay extra for an EV? Unless you drive at least 25,000 km a year, the gas savings won’t compensate for the premium you pay for the vehicle.”
The math is open to question, but he touches on an important point: the key to getting more people into EVs in the future will hinge on how much we are forced to pay for conventional fuel. Even in a world of vanishing government subsidies, a leap of gas prices into the post-two dollar per litre stratosphere would be the best thing for the economics of buying a new EV.

The cost of gas is part of a wider value proposition that Olivier believes will propel EV sales beyond early adopters. There is a price premium for sure he says, but there is also the environmental benefit of not burning gas or diesel.
And regarding range anxiety, there are 2025 EVs that take about 15 minutes to reach an 80 percent charge via Level 3, the fastest charging mode. And then there’s gas: his uncle replaced a conventional Nissan Pathfinder SUV with a Kia EV6, drove 26,000 km in the first year, and came out about $3000 ahead, buying electricity generated by Hydro Quebec instead of gas. “And you don’t have to go to the dealership three times a year for servicing either.”
Still, not everyone is convinced.
Back in Saint-Basile, Montreal retired couple André Labonté and Martine Letourneau, both 63, were kicking tires at Olivier’s Hyundai dealership recently and concluded that an EV will not work for them.
They do long road trips and don't want to deal with the hassle of finding chargers and waiting to charge. “It takes [us] 5 minutes to gas up and we're on our way!" said Labonté.
Letourneau chimes in: “Yeah, waiting to charge up, no it's not for me."
(Additional reporting by Nasuna Stuart-Ulin in Montreal)
Comments
I've been driving EV for 6 years and 150,000km and never once had to line up at a charger. That's 15,000 litres of gasoline not burned or imported and 15 oil changes, 75 litres of oil avoided. My winter tires don't look like they're ever going to wear out and I'm on my second set of summer tires. I've had only two service repairs, upper control arms, 350$ and a motor inverter fully covered. My battery/drive train warranty is good for 2 more years and my battery has lost 12% of its range, now at 440kms.
Impressive!
Impressive indeed. Cutting ties to Alberta (or imported US) oil and its associated obnoxious politics at the national scale is another big benefit.
One thing that is far superior to owning an EV, though, is living in a walkable neighbourhood. Being retired and within a 10 minute walk of seven food markets means we can leave the econobox parked 90+% of the time.
It's true that those who drive 20,000 km or more a year, and who need to drive five or more km just to get groceries would find EVs very attractive to the family budget.
It's not at all clear any more what government will ever give priority to public transit and efficacious zoning for humans instead of cars -- basically urbanizing the suburbs -- in today's political and financial climate.
“Yeah, waiting to charge up, no it's not for me." My wife and I have met some very nice people at EV charge stations. In the days when we bought gas we seldom spoke to anyone during our brief visits to gas stations.
Most early adapters of EVs do it for the sake of the climate. It's worth a bit of inconvenience to do what we can to fight the fossil fuel lobby.
The other thing not mentioned is that battery technology is getting better each year and cheaper, eventually there will be a very small premium for buying EVS. I can see people that are not technically savvy being reticent as the car is more like a phone than a car.
After a few years of driving an EV, a Leaf, when getting body work done for a small scrape my wife and I ended up with a plugin hybrid courtesy car. It was a Volt. We didn't like it. Thing is, the battery range was so short we were constantly thinking "OK, are we going to run out and have to start using gas soon? Does that mean we're going to have to stop at a bloody gas station? Come on, last till we get home and can plug in . . ." And we did in fact have to stop at a gas station at one point. Annoying.
The Leaf doesn't have that great range by current standards, just 240 km. But we never run out, never even get all that close, never worry about it, we just drive around and then charge at home. I never even bothered to get a real charging station, we attached the plug that came with the car to an extension cord to a plug in our car port, and charge it with 120 v current, very slowly. But very slowly is good enough to generally be at 100% the next morning, and in over 6 years as far as I can tell we haven't lost ANY battery range. Apparently the trickle charging is very easy on the battery.
We don't do a lot of road trips, but when we do it's fine . . . or at least, the fundamental technology is fine. We make sure we're at 100% when we start, we drive until we want a coffee, we stop and charge while we go get a coffee-and-something, we keep going, we stop for lunch and charge while we eat lunch, and so on. No biggie . . .
. . . or it would be if the companies that make for-pay chargers weren't such a pain in the ass. Can you just tap your credit card like a normal payment thing? Noooo, they all have to have stupid apps you have to download on your phone and go through a bunch of crap to setup your payment so they can sell your information or some goddamn thing. Different charging station, different app that's stupidly designed in a different stupid way. Fuck those guys, they should be regulated six ways from Sunday and forced to take payments like normal people. Or nationalized.
The article seems to treat as a given the idea that EVs are considerably more expensive than ICE cars. That is a choice by the manufacturers, both to make expensive EVs and to not sell cheaper models in Canada that are available in, for instance, Europe. It is also a choice by the Canadian government to tariff Chinese cars including amazingly cheap Chinese EVs.
This last was a stupid idea to start with, but now that we're going into a trade war with the US and they want to take us over, we might want to think twice about messing with China at the same time, which we were only ever doing because the Americans wanted us to. Do we really need a trade war with BOTH of our biggest trading partners? We have no choice about the US one unless we want to be vassals, but we do have a choice about China. We were being China's enemy because we were dutiful bit-- ah, allies of the United States and the United States wanted to be enemies with China. But the US ain't our ally any more, Trump has made that very clear, so why are we still cutting off our nose to please them?
Great point about Chinese tech, including EVs.
The EU + UK has tariffs in Chinese EVs, but they actually did a justifiable calculation (as opposed to the US and Canadian knee jerk 100% tariffs) to come up with tariff amounts that more or less protected European made EVs. I believe they're in the 35% range. BYD is now sought after by UK taxi drivers, a sure sign of affordable long term operational costs. The MG4 is a really hot seller there, mainly because MG was a British brand. I took my driver's exam decades ago in a tiny MG sports car, but that's another story.
In addition, the most advanced battery tech now comes from China with a couple of exceptions. Once they'e got market penetration, sodium batteries will be a game changer in terms of using common, cheap materials and possessing excellent cold weather performance. Anti-EV critics need to take a breath and consider the ramifications for grid storage applications too. That is arguably a lot more important than EVs. Batteries are batteries no matter where they are used.
It's important to manage Canadian tech carefully enough to avoid other nations like the USA and China from stealing or offering exorbitant buy-out money to own the tech. We have been very naive and timid in that regard. At this time of a mounting artificial economic crisis there is no reason to avoid trade with alternatives to the US. But Canada needs to start its own deep R&D, to capture value b y making finished products at home, and to develop its own brand of knowledge-based home grown intellectual property. We've already started down the battery path, why not own an equity stake and run with some of it outside of foreign ownership and investment?
Magna is a Canadian auto parts company, and they've developed their own very efficient high tech electric motors for EVs. Why can't Magna be encouraged through government and private investment to use 100% Canadian sourced materials and grow into a full blown exclusive Canadian EV maker with their own unique models and designs and target uses in cold cities and farms? Why can't Magna develop big long range electric trucks like Iveco, Scania and Volvo? Or electric trains for intercity transport?
You get the picture.
I can definitely get behind that.
I've had an Ioniq 5 for 11 months. summer consumption was about 17 kWh/100km, that gave me a range of 270km when operating the battery between 20% and 80% (46 kWh of usable energy). But consumption increased to as high as 30 kWh/100km on very cold February days (-21C). So, I could only do 150km before needing a new charge! Needless to say I could not make a long trip in winter.
The Federal Government had a ZEVIP incentive of which they wasted a large fraction by subsidizing the installation of Level 2 chargers in condos. They were hoping that the incentive would encourage the purchase of EV's, but all it did was transfer value to the property owners; very few EV's were bought.
If such a subsidy program is ever approved again, it must absolutely apply only to the installation of Level 3 (min 100kW) on highways. With a 100kW charger, the charge (to 80%) will take 28 minutes. Charging can only be completed in 15 minutes with an even more powerful charger.
The subsidy may be replaced by a drastic discounts on Teslas; sales have crashed for some reason, particularly in Germany.
Awww ..... poor little Adolph.
I can't post images in this last century tech CNO comment section, but there's an ad out now on Teslas that say
"0 to 1939 in three seconds flat!" [Elon is standing up in the back giving his infamous HH salute.]
Many legacy auto dealers, at least here in northern British Columbia, do not really want to sell EVs. The salespeople have never driven, much less owned, one. They actively steer people away from EVs. They cannot answer peoples' questions competently, so they resort to repeating the anti EV FUD they know.
This makes short term sense: there is so little maintenance to do on an EV that their main source of income evaporates. They are fighting a tough rearguard action.
And there is much ideology in the adherence to ICE.