The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of the government limiting electricity supply to a cryptocurrency mining firm in the northern part of the province because of the substantial demands it would place on the power supply.
The decision upheld an earlier court ruling against Conifex Timber Ltd., a forestry company located in Prince George with high-performance computing facilities used for cryptocurrency mining and large data centres. The company was seeking unrestricted access to B.C. electricity.
The appeal court ruled that BC Hydro has the right to act in the public interest – in this case, to protect B.C.’s electricity supply and contain electricity prices for ratepayers. Like all cryptocurrency mining operations, Conifex requires vast amounts of energy, referred to in the court ruling as “unique electricity consumption characteristics.”
Conifex was seeking to consume approximately 2.5 million megawatt hours of electrical energy per year for its cryptocurrency mining centres – nearly half the expected annual generation of the province's new Site C dam in Peace River, said Christopher O’Reilly, CEO of BC Hydro.
Canada is home to the fourth-largest crypto mining industry in the world, in part because of its abundance of clean energy. These operations require large amounts of electricity to run high-powered computers around the clock to verify cryptocurrency transactions.
While firms have targeted B.C. for its cheap electricity, recent provincial policy changes — Bill 24, the Energy Statutes Amendment Act, which regulates electricity service for cryptocurrency mining firms — curtailed the arrival of new firms because of the demands they have placed on B.C. electricity.
Those demands will only grow as the province transitions to electric vehicles, an important part of the province’s environmental goals, said Werner Antweiler, Associate Professor at the UBC Sauder School of Business.
Transitioning all of B.C.’s light duty vehicles to electric would require several terawatt hours of power — “So, up to ten, fifteen, twenty per cent of what we currently produce; we need more,” said Antweiler.
Projections from BC Hydro dating back to December 2020 for electricity demand did not account for the cryptocurrency mining industry boom in the province over the past three to five years. Now, the sudden growth in demand for electricity from crypto mining firms has forced the province to weigh the benefits of attracting new business to the province against the need to adhere to existing provincial climate goals and prevent higher electricity costs for ratepayers.
Like British Columbia, Manitoba and Quebec have similar concerns and have taken measures to delay or reduce unfettered electricity supply to industrial-scale cryptocurrency mining operations.
In 2022, Manitoba suspended all new connections with crypto mining firms to give the province time to develop a new regulatory framework in response to the new electricity demands. Hydro Quebec has increased its rates for crypto mining firms and capped the amount of electricity available to them.
Additionally, New Brunswick has issued a moratorium against all new large-scale, short-notice requests for electricity and new requests from cryptocurrency miners.
In 2022, the Ontario provincial government proposed to exclude cryptocurrency mining firms from an incentive program that would have allowed them to tame electricity costs. However, where things currently stand is somewhat unclear.
The notable outlier is Alberta, whose largely deregulated framework compared with other provinces provides an open-door policy for cryptocurrency mining firms with minimal regulation. Not only does the province see this as an opportunity to generate economic revenue, but ATB Financial — a financial institution and Crown corporation owned fully by the province of Alberta — has become a reliable banking partner for crypto mining firms.
Antweiler is not as convinced of the economic upside of these firms. “It generates absolutely no economic benefit,” says Antweiler. “[Cryptocurrency] is a speculative asset — it has no other use than to facilitate fraud, scams, and money laundering.
“This is a slow-burning Ponzi scheme,” said Antweiler. “The most successful Ponzi scheme probably in human history.”
Beyond that, the cryptocurrency industry is an environmental menace simply because of its insatiable demands on energy which in many places is generated by burning coal or gas, fossil fuels which have high carbon emissions that cause global warming.
A study from BC Hydro in 2022 warned that unchecked growth of cryptocurrency mining operations, and the ensuing potential for exponential growth in their use of electricity, could likely set back provincial climate and electrification goals. The consequences of which would ultimately be felt by consumers and ratepayers.
According to the same 2022 study, within a more global context, countries such as China, Egypt, and Qatar, have all banned cryptocurrency mining “because of concerns related to the environment, energy demands and the economy.”
Even as crypto markets plummet worldwide, crypto mining operations may pop up in deregulated regions where electricity is cheap, so long as the operations cost less to run than the value of cryptocurrencies.
Though, as more and more governments move to protect their electricity supply from overuse, there will be fewer and fewer places for these firms to go.
Justin Fiacconi / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada’s National Observer
Comments
Crypto is not only a Ponzi scheme, but vaporware as well, with nothing to back up. Anyone can setup a lab at home to do crypto mining and places an extra burden on the power grid running these rigs, if not your residentail bill. Based on recent data however, running crypto mining at home, yields no benefits, as the costs exceed what is gained on a small-scale setup.
These large scale setups however can achieve a profit, but at the expense of the power grid, which isn't fair to the rest of consumers.
To me, cryptocurrency is a scheme to steal money for the unsuspecting while also hiding the profits from the revenue agency. Furthermore, by using the public's energy, it impoverishes everybody else. I cannot understand how countries allow it
Crypto is unquestionably just a waste of chips and energy, and I remain very suspicious that most of the "AI" demand will really materialize.
But both pathologies could be taken advantage of to help transition the power grid by one important change in their billing: their electricity cost would be All The Traffic Will Bear.
Don't charge based on costs of service: charge based on maximum profit we can extract as a public utility system before they leave. And, of course, cut their power as needed to stabilize the grid.
Most Canadian jurisdictions have public electrical utilities. This gives provincial energy regulators the ability to simply pull the plug when necessary to protect the public good.
I listened to an Energi Media podcast recently with guest interviewee Mark Zacharius (sp?) with Clean Energy Canada who cited that the average national cost of power in Canada is the second lowest in the world, mainly due to Canada's legacy hydropower. The key is to double or triple capacity with wind, solar and geothermal energy along with battery storage to electrify the nation's entire econony.
Alberta is the outlier. Its private grid has severely restricted affordable renewables, and therein allowed private gas power producers to jack prices as a monopoly. Ironically, this has led to a surge in rooftop solar.
Alberta is free to crypto itself into energy poverty if it chooses. But gawd forbid that BC, Saskatchewan or Manitoba will br expected to bail Alberta out if they decide to supply crypto farms with subsidized power over their own consumers in high demand periods, leading to shortages. Power exporters to AB have the right to demand where the power is going and either charge accordingly, or limit the amount.