By now, most politicians understand that the best way to deal with Donald Trump and his reckless pronouncements and policies is to take him seriously rather than literally. That was former adviser Anthony Scaramucci’s advice back in 2016, and it held true throughout Trump’s first term. And yet, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has repeatedly chosen to take him at his word when it comes to his repeated threats against Canada and the supposed reasons behind them.
That credulity was on full display last week, when Smith and some of her key ministers gathered to respond to Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canadian exports. Flanked by Minister of Justice Mickey Amery and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Services Mike Ellis, both of whom were sporting spiffy new security-cosplay jackets — and, in an unusual sight, a rifle-toting police officer — Smith touted the progress her government had made on border security.
This might have made some small modicum of sense a few weeks ago, when it was at least theoretically plausible that Trump’s stated concerns about the border were genuine and not the fig leaf he needed to invoke the International Emergency Economic Power Act and impose his long-desired tariffs on Canada and Mexico. But now, with his administration’s reported interest in forcing automakers to relocate their activities in the United States, renegotiating the Columbia Water Treaty and even redrawing our border, this continued focus by Canadian conservatives on border security is bordering on the delusional.
So, too, is her apparently unshakable belief in her own powers of persuasion. She continues to appear on far-right podcasts and programs, and is listed as one of the headline speakers at PragerU’s “East Coast Gala” in Florida later this month. According to its own website, “PragerU is an educational media platform dedicated to promoting pro-American values,” one that just happens to be funded and financed by oil and gas industry executives and other right-wing sources. Why, exactly, is Smith travelling to Florida to promote “pro-American values”?
She would, I’m sure, suggest that it’s another example of the diplomacy that she continues to believe is working, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding. I’d suggest it might be about trying to seed the ground for a post-political (and post-Canada) career as a talking head in America’s well-funded right-wing media ecosystem. But either way, one thing is clear: she believes that her mutual self-interest lies more with folks like Ben Shapiro (her co-headliner) and PragerU than with her fellow Canadians.
That would explain her obvious reluctance to offend or upset Americans with the kind of tough talk that Ontario Premier Doug Ford has used in his recent media interviews. In the same press conference that supposedly amounted to her joining “Team Canada,” Smith refused to even entertain the idea of using Canada’s oil and gas exports as leverage. “There’s no circumstance under which I would support an export tax,” she said. Nothing says “Team Canada” like forcing it to take its most dangerous scorer off the ice, I suppose.
Rather than supporting efforts to reduce our dependence on the American market, Smith continues to promote deeper trade relationships with the United States. That includes her repeated promise to double Alberta’s oil and gas production, requiring even more American purchases of Canadian fossil fuels. “We’ve been approached with several new pipeline proposals to take more Alberta oil and natural gas to the United States given the U.S. president’s stated goal of U.S. energy dominance,” she said last week. “It’s in both of our countries’ best interests to double the amount of Canadian crude moving south.”
Ironically, for all of her assiduous care and attention to the Trump administration’s needs, Smith accidentally delivered the most striking threat to its ambitions in the course of laying out her own. “Whether the U.S. president wishes to acknowledge it or not,” she said, “the United States not only needs our oil and gas today, they’re also going to need it more and more with each passing year once they notice their declining domestic reserves and production are wholly insufficient to keep up with the energy demands of US consumers and industry, let alone having anything left over to export.”
Here, again, Smith is making the mistake of taking him literally rather than seriously. Trump’s notion of “energy dominance” is almost laughably incoherent, given his stated desire to both reduce imports from Canada and build the Keystone XL pipeline — which would, of course, increase imports from Canada. But he seems deadly serious about his desire to make America self-reliant when it comes to resources, and waving their apparent vulnerability on that front in his face is just asking for trouble.
It’s not just trouble for Smith, of course. In repeatedly putting petroleum and province over country, she’s inviting disaster for Conservative Party of Canada Leader Pierre Poilievre. Mark Carney will surely be tempted to test where his loyalties actually lie, and there may be no better way to do that than with the very export tax Smith has preemptively rejected. Would Poilievre side with Carney and Doug Ford, or with more appeasement-curious leaders like Danielle Smith and Scott Moe? That’s a question he may have to answer in public soon — and far sooner than he’d like.
Either way, in her efforts to promote and defend Alberta, Smith seems determined to keep putting America first. Maybe that’s because she’s afraid of the pro-separation movement that lurks within her political base. Or maybe that’s because she genuinely believes that she can flatter her way to victory. Regardless of what’s driving her decisions, though, one thing should be clear by now: Smith has no interest in actually playing for Team Canada. The rest of us should start acting accordingly.
Comments
Talk about trivializing our country's position in the world never before seen by any of us. She's playing show and tell with the costumes and the gun as if this whole horrible scenario is nothing but a video game. That she hasn't taken the stance that Ford has is very telling.
Max, what about Saskatchewan? Moe put his hand on his heart when the subject of the convoy came up during their illegal occupation of the streets of Ottawa surrounding our Parliament Hill.
Yes Scott Moe did ( hand on heart for the illegal convoy)
In the last Saskatchewan provincial election, Saskatoon and Regina made a clear statement to Scott Moe. They had had enough of his Sask. Party Conservatives. And once again, the rural vote carried the day for him..
Much like Alberta. How exactly did this even happen with elections in Alberta and Saskatchewan? The major cities have no voice?
Energi Media posted this really informative discussion (30 minute listen, well worth the time!) on the reasoning behind Danielle Smith's pro-oil stance. Basically, she's not only captured by previous employment in O&G, but by the big annual reports OPEC publishes that projects oil growth forward for decades. Here's the antidote, and it goes right to the foundational assumptions behind OPEC's conclusions. Note that Smith doesn't have a Plan B if oil stops growing.
'How OPEC Ate Danielle Smith's Brain.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slz38D-kdx4
Is Danielle Smith auditioning for leader of Canada's "Vichy" government?
Goddamn quisling. It's no surprise--she's wholly owned by the oil companies operating in Alberta, and they in turn are mostly American-owned. We should nationalize the bastards.
Agree wholeheartedly ..
None of Danielle Smith's actions or words are surprising. It is surprising how tolerant moderate Albertans are of her, and the rest if Canada for that matter.
But she is toying with crossing a big line. Siding with the UCP's mainly rural fringe base and their urban extremists and conspirators will sideline the majority of Albertans.
Alberta needs to have a separation referendum more than ever right about now. It's time for individual citizens and families to finally come to grips with the reality of losing their Canadian citizenship. This separatist notion has been so loosely and carelessly bandied about by loudmouth discontents for generations. At a time when Canadian sovereignty is put into question by the crazy dude next door, Canada needs Alberta to clarify whether it is with us or against us. There is no viable way to straddle both camps.
I believe all but the most deluded, ideologue and gullible Albertans will identify with Canada first and foremost and reject separation only to join the declining American empire. Forcing the issue in an actual referendum will resolve it.
In either case, Canada, at least, must have a plan for either Yes or No, and must, at all costs, prepare to fight back hard -- very, very hard -- against a foreign and internal digital and propaganda interference onslought. Brexit was won through misinformation spread widely by social media. That is where the contest will be won or lost. The mainstream media must also be held to account.
The simplicity of the question is also key. Make no bones about it. Both the Stay and Leave campaigns and their respective believers must understand that their citizenship is on the line.
In my view, if the consequences are expressed in the clearest and simplest terms, it will be that much harder for the pro-US side to obfuscate and distort the question or the consequences.
The very fact a separation referendum is actually going to happen will probably cause millions of Albertans to wake up, at long last, and deal with the radical extremist minority that seeks to control the province.
Is there an alternative to a separation referendum? Yes. But it still requires average Albertans to open their eyes and to be willing to act.
The alternative would be a powerful pro-Canada movement in Alberta to hound the separatist talking heads into getting the fuck out of the country. MAGA has no place anywhere in Canadian territory. A Go Fund Me campaign could be formed to help finance their moving expenses to the Alberta-Montana border.
Hell, they can even form a big convoy on their way out, bristling with Trump and American flags. Make a big show of it.
Simultaneously, Canadian citizens can come from afar and line Highway #2 waving thousands of maple leaf flags all the way to the border to bid them good riddance and give them a half million middle fingers.
I'd be tempted to temporarily return to my former home province to join the celebration, and to reclaim the Canadian flag from the first convoy that badly abused it a few years ago.
BTW, the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously rejected convoy lawyer's recent attempts to quash the upcoming class action lawsuit against the Ottawa convoy participants. Now many convoy truckers are going to lose their rigs, businesses and homes.
Here's to the rule of law!