Climate crisis deniers explain why they like US Energy Secretary Chris Wright

In mid-February, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright described the global effort to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions in dark and conspiratorial terms.

“Net zero 2050 is a sinister goal,” he told the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC), an international gathering of conservatives convened by Jordan Peterson, a Canadian podcaster, author, and anti-climate powerbroker. “It’s certainly been a powerful tool used to grow government power [and], top-down control, and shrink human freedom.”

Then, in March, Wright gave a speech at the 43rd annual CERAWeek energy conference, where he attacked the Biden administration’s climate policies as a “quasi-religious” agenda “that imposed endless sacrifices on our citizens.”

Those views put Wright, a former CEO with the fracking company Liberty Energy, far outside the Paris Agreement consensus among many world leaders and heads of major corporations that climate change is an urgent issue that requires fundamental changes to our global energy system.

But Wright’s reactionary statements are winning praise from fossil fuel advocates, who acknowledge that human-caused climate change is real but deny that it presents existential threats to civilization – what watchdog nonprofits, such as the Center for Countering Digital Hate, refer to as “the new denial.” 

In exclusive interviews with DeSmog and Canada’s National Observer during the ARC conference, three prominent figures, who deny there is a climate emergency, explained why they’re excited that Wright holds one of the most consequential cabinet posts in the Trump administration, with one referring to the US energy secretary as “a good friend.”

Bjorn Lomborg

One particularly influential climate crisis denier is Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish political scientist who for decades has been trying to convince policymakers and the public that there are more important global challenges to address than climate change. This is the subject of his most recent book, Best Things First, which Lomborg was promoting at ARC. Last year, Peterson personally presented a copy of the book to Elon Musk.

“We'll have to wait and see if he actually reads it,” Lomborg said of Musk in an interview with DeSmog and Canada’s National Observer at the conference.

Lomborg, who is an advisor to ARC, said during a keynote speech that efforts to transition off fossil fuels are a “green fantasy.” Lomborg acknowledges that climate change is real but claims, contrary to decades of scientific and economic evidence, that it will be relatively easy and painless for humankind to adapt.

Those arguments have resonated with Wright, who during a 2020 podcast referred to Lomborg’s previous book False Alarm as “fantastic,” and earlier this year, described him as a “friend” on LinkedIn.  

Asked what he thinks about Trump’s pick for energy secretary, Lomborg replied: “Look, Chris Wright is a great guy and he's very smart. And I'm very happy that we can get a more sense-based approach to how we do energy.”

Part of that, according to Lomborg, is acknowledging — despite low-carbon investment surpassing $2 trillion in 2024 — that a transformative global shift to green energy isn’t happening any time soon. “We're not there yet,” he said. “And that, I think, is what Chris Wright can help us to do, which is to say, ‘Let's be realistic now and let's find smarter ways to have greener energy sources in the future’.”

Scott Tinker

During his 13-minute presentation at ARC, Scott Tinker outlined his view that energy has to be affordable, reliable and clean, criteria that in his view disadvantages renewable energy. “If you want 100 per cent clean, you don’t get much of these other things,” he told the conference. “There are trade-offs in the real world.”

Tinker runs an organization called Switch Energy Alliance that creates videos about energy and climate change for classrooms, museums and professional training sessions. The organization says that it wants an “energy-educated future that is objective, nonpartisan and sensible.”

But Tinker tends to promote the benefits of fossil fuels, while downplaying the urgency of addressing global temperature rise. During a podcast interview in March, Tinker said it was “a very strange form of economic colonialism” to argue against developing world countries burning fossil fuels “because we’ll wreck the climate.” We shouldn’t fear a bit of atmospheric warming, Tinker added, urging listeners to instead consider “all the positive things” countries gain from oil, gas and coal.

Wright has used similar language, telling a gathering of African leaders in March that it would be “a paternalistic post-colonial attitude” for the US to stand in the way of their fossil fuel resources.

The similarities between Wright’s and Tinker’s views aren’t a coincidence. Tinker told DeSmog in an interview at ARC that he and the US energy secretary have known each other for years. “Chris is a good friend,” Tinker said. “We’ve bounced a lot back and forth.”

One other area they seem to agree on is rejecting carbon dioxide’s legal status as a pollutant in the US, which helps provide the basis for the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate emissions. That’s been a long-time goal of climate denial organizations, such as the CO2 Coalition and Heartland Institute.

“We shouldn’t confuse [CO2] with being a pollutant,” Tinker said.

Robert Bryce

For years Robert Bryce has been on a mission to convince the world that renewable energy can never replace or out-compete coal, gas and oil. Previously, a senior fellow with the Manhattan Institute — a think tank with a long history of accepting fossil fuel money and questioning the scientific consensus on climate change — Bryce now attacks climate solutions as an author, speaker and filmmaker.

During his speech at ARC, he claimed that “we are inundated with climate catastrophism,” and argued without evidence that the primary motivation for environmentalists to be opposed to fossil fuels is because their organizations have “enormous” budgets, saying “it’s a big business.”

Bryce is a long-time proponent of nuclear energy, something he shares in common with Wright, who stepped down as a member of the board of directors at the nuclear company Oklo after he was confirmed as energy secretary in February.

“Chris gets it,” Bryce said in an interview with DeSmog. “Chris knows what the score is. He’s a natural gas guy, a hydrocarbon guy. He’s promoting nuclear power. Hopefully, this administration, now that they’re actually talking about nuclear, can actually move the ball forward, it’s overdue.”

Bryce and Wright also seem to share opposition to carbon capture and storage, a technology widely favored by oil and gas producers, which tout it as key to reducing emissions from their operations, despite it being widely used to pull more oil from the ground. Under Wright, the US Department of Energy is considering cutting billions of dollars in funding for projects utilizing the technology.

“There is only one reason why any of these hydrocarbon companies are doing carbon capture,” Bryce said. “Subsidies, that’s it.”

“It will never work at scale,” he added. “Once you get that CO2 super-compressed and you’re pushing it down underground, there are very few places where you can actually sequester it. So, it’s a lot of money wasted.”

This special investigation between Canada’s National Observer and DeSmog was produced in collaboration with the Institute for Sustainability, Education and Action and TRACE Foundation.