Keep climate a national priority
The 2025 election saw a handful of climate champions lose their seats.
Some MPs with a history of work on climate, environment, jobs and related issues chose not to run — including Charlie Angus, Richard Cannings, Monique Pauzé and Kristina Michaud — but others were defeated, in some cases due to a split of the progressive vote.
Here is a quick look at some key climate voices that won’t be returning to the House of Commons this session.
Laurel Collins, NDP
One of the most obvious losses is Laurel Collins, unseated in Victoria by Liberal Will Greaves. Collins was the NDP’s critic for environment and climate change.
Collins led the negotiations on eliminating international fossil fuel subsidies, something she said the Liberals would not have done without pressure from the New Democrats.
Collins was “a great collaborator and ally to the climate movement,” Caroline Brouillette, executive director of Climate Action Network Canada, said in an interview with Canada’s National Observer.
“She was particularly vocal regarding ending fossil fuel subsidies and different legislative and regulatory mechanisms to hold the oil and gas industry accountable for its pollution,” Brouillette said. “She's one voice that many environmentalists will miss in Parliament.”
She sat on the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development which dealt with issues, including fossil fuel subsidies, greenhouse gas emission reduction measures, toxic oilsands tailings leaks, plastic regulation and more.
Former Green MP Mike Morrice had high praise for Collins’ climate work, particularly her push to get federal funding for a Youth Climate Corps, a priority shared by the Green Party. He recounted a reception she held that brought MPs, parliamentary secretaries and cabinet ministers together with civil society in an attempt to earn federal funding for the idea.
“It wasn’t about her,” Morrice said, noting this isn’t always the case when MPs hold such events.
This work paid off — the Liberals’ election platform included a two-year pilot Youth Climate Corps with funding of $28 million each year.
Mike Morrice, Green Party
Morrice lost narrowly to Conservative Kelly DeRidder in Kitchener-Centre, leaving Elizabeth May the lone Green in Parliament.
“I'm probably most proud of putting forward the motion calling for a windfall profit tax on the excess profits of big oil that came directly from gouging Canadians at the pumps,” Morrice told Canada’s National Observer in a phone interview. The Parliamentary Budget Officer determined the proposed one-time tax of 15 per cent on the sector’s excess profits could rake in $4.2 billion over the next five years.
That motion did not pass, but started a larger conversation around how we could reinvest the excess profits of the oil and gas industry to make life more affordable and address the climate crisis, he said.
Although the Green Party doesn’t get a seat on federal committees because it doesn’t have official party status, Morrice was always showing up to meetings and pushing his colleagues — sometimes successfully — to let him question witnesses, including oil and gas CEOs.
“We're on track for a 3.2 degree rise by the year 2100 and what I've heard from the executives who've joined us this morning is that there's no need for an emissions cap. There's no need for windfall tax on their excess profits. There's no need for any regulation. They've got it all covered when, as we heard from Mr. van Koeverden, their emissions are rising considerably on an absolute basis, as well as a per-barrel basis,” Morrice said on June 6, 2024 to Suncor CEO Rich Kruger and Imperial Oil CEO Brad Corson.
He recalled collaborating with NDP and Bloc Quebecois MPs to hold press conferences along with civil society groups and climate experts to ensure their voices were heard in the House of Commons.
Brouillette noted that Morrice’s work on disability justice and the Canada Disability Benefit, while not directly climate-related, was “really significant” and important work.
Like most Conservative candidates, DeRidder did not participate in local debates.
Taylor Bachrach, NDP

Taylor Bachrach was the NDP transport critic, a file intrinsically linked to climate change because 23 per cent of Canada’s national emissions came from the transport sector in 2023.
Bachrach led the charge by calling out the gradual privatization of Via Rail’s proposed high-frequency rail corridor in Ontario and Quebec, Morrice said.
“Taylor is just such a well-spoken, well-researched, far less partisan and climate-focused parliamentarian,” Morrice said.
Bachrach also regularly appeared at other committees, including the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, where he grilled the head of the Alberta Energy Regulator about oversight of the Kearl oilsands tailings leaks, as did many of his NDP colleagues.
Bachrach and Collins also initiated a committee study of environmental contamination at the Transport Canada dock in Fort Chipewyan. Brouillette recalls working with him at COP 28 in Dubai and said he is someone who “deeply understands” the issues around sustainable jobs and just transition.
Others:
Some MPs didn’t work directly on the climate file but their work and parliamentary contributions intersected with it.
Like many Albertans, former Edmonton Griesbach MP Blake Dejarlais has family ties to the energy sector — both he and his father were energy workers — but this did not stop Desjarlais from confronting an oil and gas lobby executive over hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid property tax that fossil fuel companies owe to municipalities. Desjarlais commented on emissions and the need for a just transition in his role on the International Trade committee.
Desjarlais and NDP MP Lori Idlout also called out the federal government for its ongoing failure to support First Nations dealing with climate emergencies after a 2022 report by the auditor general revealed chronic underfunding. Idlout was re-elected on Monday.
“There is no separating climate action from reconciliation and the need to listen to Indigenous leaders,” Morrice said.
Niki Ashton of the NDP represented Churchill-Keewatinook Aski since 2008, but was defeated Monday by Liberal Rebecca Chartrand. This northern Manitoba riding has faced wildfire evacuations and other climate impacts felt acutely in Canada’s North: the city of Flin Flon was without internet or cell service for days after wildfires burned through fibre optic and telecom lines, leaving residents, the hospital and other major services in the dark.
Ashton called on the federal government to use its jurisdiction over telecommunications companies to ensure critical infrastructure plans are in place for communities during climate emergencies, particularly in areas prone to climate catastrophes such as wildfires.
Brouillette said another climate casualty of the 2025 election is John Aldag, a former Liberal MP and chair of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources. Aldag’s leadership on the proposed oil and gas emissions cap and Sustainable Jobs Act “was essential,” she said, particularly when the Conservatives filibustered the Sustainable Jobs Act for weeks. Aldag resigned from his federal role to run in the BC election last fall, was unsuccessful and was defeated Monday by Conservative incumbent Tako Van Popta in Langley Township-Fraser Heights. Former Liberal MP Leah Taylor Roy was also an effective member of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, according to Brouillette.
Natasha Bulowski / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada’s National Observer
Comments
Did any of our "climate champions" defend carbon pricing?
Federal and provincial NDP politicians abandoned consumer carbon pricing before the Liberals did! Using the same false arguments the Conservatives advanced.
Rather than defend sensible climate policy that serves the interests of working-class families and communities, NDP and other progressive politicians ceded the argument to the lying Conservatives, pandered to the anti-science rabble, deferred to public ignorance, and sacrificed climate policy for votes. With nothing on the table to replace it.
NDP environment critic Laurel Collins gave up on carbon pricing a year ago:
"NDP backs Conservative demand for 'emergency meeting' between PM and premiers on carbon pricing" (CP, Apr 10, 2024)
"The federal carbon price is not the 'be-all, end-all' of climate policy and New Democrats are open to alternative plans presented by premiers, NDP environment critic Laurel Collins said Wednesday.
"Collins accused the Liberal government of using climate as a political wedge issue and said a meeting would help unite Canadians and spark new ideas.
"… 'We need to bring Canadians together to fight the climate emergency, to tackle the cost of living crisis, and we need a government that will support them.'
"… The Conservatives insist that the carbon price is making life less affordable for Canadians, while the Liberals insist their carbon price rebates mean most Canadians actually end up with more money at the end of the day."
A fact that somehow escaped the NDP. 'Twas very disappointing to see them back the Conservatives in undermining and unwinding climate policy. The carbon levy with rebate was progressive policy that puts more $$$ in the pockets of 80% of households.
"Collins accused the Liberal government of using climate as a political wedge issue"
Or the NDP was trying to score political points off the Liberals, while the Conservatives made a play for working class voters.
Rather than defend sensible climate policy that serves the interests of working-class families and communities, the NDP decide to pander to the anti-climate rabble, defer to public ignorance, and sacrifice climate policy for votes. With nothing on the table to replace it.
WTF, NDP?
Let the Conservatives attack the carbon tax. All sound and fury. But when progressive politicians join in, that spells its defeat.
"We’re still being deceived about the carbon tax: Full Comment podcast" (National Post, Mar 24, 2025)
An hour of bad-faith non-stop disinformation about carbon pricing, brought to you by your friends at the National Post with Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation, author of the new book, “Axing the Tax.”
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/were-still-being-deceived-about-the-ca…
A carbon tax remains on industrial polluters. In theory, Carney said the revenue will be directed to funding heat pumps, solar + wind power, energy efficiency upgrades and so forth. We'll have to wait and see how that pans out in reality.
I agree it was shameful to eliminate the consuner carbon tax based only on political expedience. The NDP and Libs share the blame. This illustrates how influential political narratives are on governance, even when the science and economic impacts of climate change have never been clearer.
Politics matters. So does an electoral system that allows expedience to outweigh science. That must change.
We were in Victoria visiting family on election day, staying in a downtown hotel smack in the heart of Laurel Collins' riding when she lost it to Liberal Will Greaves. I was disappointed because she did great work up until she followed her party to separate itself from their previous support of the consumer carbon tax based on poll numbers. A lot of good that did, eh?
Will Greaves is a UVic prof working on climate and Arctic policy analysis. He is not a rank and file activist per se, but he is not a Conservative climate denier, doubter or delayer.
It remains to be seen where the Carney Libs take their climate and energy files. There was a lot of talk about clean energy, energy efficient new housing, clean power grids and electrifying industry (one campaign stop was at an Ontario steel plant about to fire up a new electric arc furnace and thereafter eliminate 70% of its carbon emissions...). But there was also a smattering of O&G in Carney's narrative.
It's anybody's guess how far Carney will take his sop to AB. He needs only three votes to pass legislation in the House. For clean energy and climate action I'd surmise the NDP and BQ will be fully on board. On O&G he could reach out to the Conservatives. He can also afford to leave AB and SK to their own fate without as many subsidies; no doubt Carney has noticed Danielle Smith's obnoxious rhetoric on separation has toned down with the Conservative's federal loss and her weakened position with respect to blackmailing the feds yet again for more largesse.
If Carney pulls a Trudeau-Freeland-Poilievre and dives into the deep end of the O&G pool he will lose the progressive vote that gave him this opportunity to lead. He's smart, and I think he knows that very well. Noneteless, he may dip a big toe into the shallow end on CCUS and lose a portion of the progressive vote.
For every action there an equal reaction.
"a smattering of O&G in Carney's narrative"
A wee bit of understatement.
Liberal Party news release (April 9, 2025):
"Mark Carney’s Liberals to make Canada the world’s leading energy superpower
"'Canada has a tremendous opportunity to be the world’s leading energy superpower, in both clean and conventional energy,' said Mark Carney, Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. 'We are going to aggressively develop projects that are in the national interest in order to protect Canada’s energy security, diversify our trade, and enhance our long-term competitiveness – all while reducing emissions.
"Get clean energy projects built quickly across Canada by:
"fast-tracking Projects of National Interest, which will be jointly identified with provinces and territories and Indigenous peoples;
"developing a trade and energy corridor, along with provinces, territories, and Indigenous partners, for transport, energy, critical minerals and digital connectivity
"Secure Canada’s energy and electricity sovereignty by:
"… investing in Canada’s conventional and clean energy potential, so we can reduce our reliance on the United States and build trading relationships with reliable partners.
"… We will work with the oil and gas sector to reduce their emissions in a cost effective and efficient manner; we cannot lose sight of our obligation to address climate change while ensuring the long-term competitiveness of Canada’s energy sector."
https://liberal.ca/mark-carneys-liberals-to-make-canada-the-worlds-lead…
The Liberals classify Canadian O&G as "clean energy". Who knew?
"What you need to know about the Liberals' promise to make Canada a 'leading energy superpower'" (Financial Post, Apr 15, 2025)
Carney: “My government will work closely with our oil and gas industry to reduce their emissions over time, so that Canadian conventional energy will supply the world for decades to come.”
"At last week’s debate, Carney endorsed the Pathways Alliance’s carbon capture megaproject as something his government would advance if elected."
"What's in Mark Carney's climate plan?" (National Observer, 23-Apr-25)
"Mixed messages: Carney Liberals pledge money for LNG while bridling against industry demands" (National Observer, March 28, 2025)
The Carney government provided $200 million to the Cedar LNG project.
Carney is on side with an east-west pipeline:
"Carney lays out plan to help economy along amid Trump-induced market chaos" (CBC, Apr 07, 2025)
"Over the medium term, Carney said a re-elected Liberal government would 'accelerate major investments' to spur economic growth, adding Canada should build out natural resources projects to ween itself off U.S. and other foreign energy supplies.
"He said getting Western Canadian oil to eastern markets will make the country collectively richer, and refineries won't have to import 500,000 barrels of oil a day from abroad."
"Quebec should use oil from Alberta, not the U.S., Carney says" (Montreal Gazette, April 07, 2025)
Mark Carney says he wants Quebecers to use oil from Alberta rather than the United States — but a new pipeline would require Quebec’s blessing.
“Quebec uses 350,000 on average barrels of oil a day, 70 per cent of which comes from the U.S.,” the Liberal leader told a press conference in Victoria, B.C..
“There is a big advantage to Canada to push that out, use our own oil, use the resources from that for other things, including protecting our environments (and) our social programs.”
The Liberal leader, a former United Nations Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, said there is no contradiction between his positions on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and building pipelines.
"Canada will no longer cover travel costs of experts it nominates to UN's climate science body" (CBC, Apr 12, 2025)
"In a sudden and unexplained change from previous decades, the federal government has stopped covering the travel costs of Canadian experts volunteering for the next major global climate science assessment."
Laura Tozer, UofT: “The Liberal platform in some ways shows some missed opportunities to advance this vision of how climate action can bring economic development and affordability for Canadians because it … is MIRED IN PROPPING UP DYING FOSSIL FUEL INDUSTRIES."
A plan to fail.
Okay. If Energy East to Quebec was actually proposed, is it not reasonable that Quebec will have a say? Well, at least the BQ has spoken up in the last few days and rejected it. Carney's win came mainly from Quebec. He will risk failure or worse, defeat, with a possible non-confidence vote if he succumbs to O&G propaganda and blackmail.
This is so unlike Trudeau's TMX push through BC where he could afford to lose some votes, which put him in a minority government with a pliable NDP.
Should Quebec and / or the BQ call out Carney for pushing a pipeline and Carney is defeated, then enter the Conservatives who will also push pipelines and largely fail on Indigenous consultation and Quebec's power to say "Non." But they would also succeed in defeating the remaining industrial carbon tax and environmental regs.
Alternatively, Carney could consult with all players in Quebec and conclude it will be much easier to electrify transportation there to eliminate their dependence on US ?or any) oil. Quebecers are very proud if their huge hydroelectric legacy and would likely respond in kind electorally to any help Carney gives to electrify the province fully using their own publicly owned clean power.
In addition, none of the existing pipelines are running at capacity, so building more will not be based on any sound business case. Even LNG faces a huge build out of renewables in China, SE Asia and the global south where China is very active bringing cheap Chinese EVs, solar + wind infrastructure and expanded ports and manufacturing of the above products.
The age of oil is nearing its peak.
Moreover, it is not an understatement to say Carney's narrative over thec10 years prior to this election campaign was majority focused on clean energy and energy efficiency. His campaign rhetoric is distinctly different than the ideas expressed in his book. It remains to be seen what action he will take (the truth is in action, not words; you cannot judge Carney on Trudeau's past actions or words). Carney has less to lose in AB and SK, and everything to lose in QB and Canada's big cities.