One vote. That’s all that separated the Liberal and Bloc Quebecois candidates in the riding of Terrebonne after a judicial recount that moved the Liberals one seat closer to a majority government. Unfortunately, it’s also apparently all that separated some Conservative Party of Canada candidates from flirting with election conspiracy theories — the very sort that now defines the MAGA brand of conservatism they spent the election disavowing.
Michelle Ferreri, the former CPC MP for Peterborough (who, it should be said, lost by almost 10,000 votes), fed this dangerous beast with a recent social media post. “One vote,” it said, followed by three rolling eyes emojis. Ron Chhinzer, the defeated CPC candidate in Oakville-East, also hinted at his own skepticism of the result. “One vote, eh?”
There was far less nudging and winking coming from the online influencers, social media warriors and digital outrage farmers that have long formed a key part of Pierre Poilievre’s political base. They have far fewer qualms about embracing the idea that the election was being rigged, whether by Elections Canada or the Liberal government, and that Canada’s election process couldn’t be trusted. After trying to undermine the legitimacy of Poilievre’s defeat in Carleton with a series of discredited and debunked theories, they’ve apparently moved on to questioning the entire democratic process.
If that sounds like an echo of the MAGA universe’s attitude towards elections their party doesn’t win, well, it should. Former MP and Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day suggested that the growing use of mail-in ballots poses a risk of — you guessed it — election fraud. That’s both a clear callback to the MAGA universe’s favourite conspiracy theory about the 2020 election and a warning that the virus of know-nothing Trumpism is actively spreading on our side of the border.
In fairness, there are some high-profile Conservatives who are willing to set the record straight here. Nick Kouvalis, the founder of Campaign Research and longtime Doug Ford insider, patiently explained how the process of judicial recounts work on his own social media account. “All parties have the time and the resources — especially the CPC — to send their best lawyers to the judicial recount and have full participation throughout that process,” he wrote. “Maybe the Conservative Party can speak to their supporters in an official capacity and explain what happened in the court-ordered review?”
Dimitris Soudas, the former executive director of the Conservative Party of Canada and director of communications to Stephen Harper, also took a swipe at the people trying to peddle conspiracy theories about the result. “Stolen election in Terrebonne? Please — that recount was watched more closely than a toddler holding scissors. Ben Hur, his chariot crew, and half of Rome were practically leaning over every ballot.”
The problem is that the Conservatives stepping up to knock down these sorts of conspiracy theories aren’t the elected ones — much less the highest-profile ones. De-facto leader Pierre Poilievre hasn’t said a word about it. Neither has interim leader Andrew Scheer, who will lead the CPC caucus until Poilievre inevitably wins his by-election in the safest Conservative riding in Canada. The more credible media sources that feed the Conservative political community in Canada, whether it’s Postmedia or The Hub, have been equally quiet here.
Maybe it’s because Conservative leaders are afraid of the people they’ve chosen to serve and represent — after all, they’ve seen leader after leader turfed by the fringes. Maybe it’s because they don’t care about the risks to democracy posed by conspiracy theories about election fraud and vote rigging. Either way, it’s a form of political negligence that could have serious consequences — not just for Canada but the Conservative movement that wants to lead it one day.
They’ve seen what the MAGA movement has done to their more sensible Republican peers to the south, from the openly defiant (Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger) to the quietly submissive (Mitch McConnell, Bill Cassidy). Letting that brand of politics into their party will not end well for them, least of all the ones who believe in things like facts and decency. Like so many Republicans, Canada’s Conservatives might try to convince themselves that embracing Trump’s toxic populism is a means to their broader political end. If they’re not careful here, they might also find out that it has its own ends in mind.
Comments
Thanks Max. The claims, inferences, nods and winks are appalling. If nothing else indicates that this Conservative party should not form government, this alone would do it. ( Of course, there are many other reasons!) By not speaking out to set the record straight, both Poilievre and Scheer are proving their unfitness for public office.
You are exactly right. I would like to know why Poilievre is getting such special treatment when he lost his huge riding plus the 25 point lead and yet here he is getting interviewed for opinion yesterday and predictably he was full of insult and venom. Why is he getting his diapers changed on a daily basis. 1. Gets to stay in Stornoway. Why? https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-no-longer-entitled-to-live-at…
2. Gets an extremely safe riding to run in. Why? Is he so afraid to run in a not-so-safe riding because he just isn't palatable anywhere else?
The Prime Minister is being 'too' fair in allowing a by-election asap. We all know Poilievre would never, ever consider doing the same for any Liberal. In fact his buddy Smith hasn't called a by-election for Nenshi has she. She's afraid of Nenshi as she well should be because he so humanly understanding in a moderate, fair way.
The calling card of MAGA is blatantly eschewing both "facts and decency," along with their enthusiastic, often younger band of followers fairly recently attracted to this new and "fun" style of UFC politics. To understand this I think you have to understand how much a part of this generation's style comes from novelty and/or "trending" on social media, and who knew "adulting" could be so entertaining?
Calling MAGA types "know nothings" is accurate, as is the assumption that more of them here is dangerous. The proof of this is in the election results where the Convoy Party somehow "did well" instead of being decimated down to two seats like they REALLY should have been, nasty, lying pieces of sh** that they so openly and unashamedly were/ARE, like Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservatives were back in the good old days when facts and decency still mattered.
Happily, "events" have enabled us to give them another four years to hopefully well and truly hang themselves once and for all, made much better by Carney, who is clearly just not interested in engaging with the stupid, braying intransigence of Poilievre and Co.
Typical rage farming by the conservatives as usual, using the same playbook as the Orange Sphincter MAGA clown. Fortunately, our system has more scrutiny than seen in the USA.
It will be interesting to see if the conservatives vote down everything, they ran on should Carney introduces the same promises that both parties campaigned on. If they do, they should be called out in the House of Commons as lying to the Canadian public during the election campaign.
There s a concept in psychology called projection and I have witnessed it often in the 21st century cons. They accuse others of what they are so obviously doing themselves. Who will ever forget the so called "Fair Elections Act" which pp tried to perpetrate. He s also big on denial.
It would be a life thrill if the voters of Battle River-Crowfoot showed him the door. Would he, or at least the cons, finally get the message WE DO NOT WANT HIM!
It is an unfortunate truth that the failure of party leaders to support the elections officials shouldn't be overlooked. So much effort is expended to validate poll results and vote scrutiny on questionable ballots. We can do better!
There is additional information available regarding the election in the riding. I recommend the CBC "At Issue" panel from this past Thursday evening.
So, sure, take morons within the CPC to task, but also take a bit of time to learn a little more. It seems as though the local election bureaucracy made some errors which could reasonably be viewed as having affected the result.
The discussion starts at about 17:00.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5FWmVA5v08Y&pp=ygUMYXQgaXNzdWUgY2Jj