Prime Minister Mark Carney’s mandate letter to his cabinet made one fleeting mention of climate change, but political experts and one MP say it’s too soon to despair.
The letter, published May 21, lays out seven priorities, including “building one Canadian economy,” bringing down costs, tackling affordable housing, strengthening the armed forces, strengthening trade relationships and more.
The second last paragraph stated: “We will fight climate change.” The only other related reference is Carney’s oft-repeated line about turning Canada into “an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energies.” Fossil fuel energy, like oil and gas, is often referred to as “conventional energy.”
The letter says little about climate, “but it's so vague that I don't want to jump to conclusions,” Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said in a phone interview with Canada’s National Observer. May said she’s waiting for more detail in next week’s throne speech.
“If climate gets as short shrift in the speech from the throne as it's gotten in this mandate letter, I will be very worried,” May said.
King Charles III is set to officially open Parliament with a throne speech on May 27 in Ottawa.
Despite her worry, May said Carney’s book, Values, does indicate that he understands the need to move quickly to address the climate crisis.
Two other political experts agree that it's too early to read into the scant mention of climate change.
“At this point, I wouldn't be too quick to judge the prime minister on the basis of the veiled reference and then, the direct reference to climate change, but rather to wait and see how he approaches this,” Kathy Brock, a professor of policy and politics at Queen’s University, said in a phone interview with Canada’s National Observer.
“It’s consistent with his thinking in his book — as he laid out, when you address an economy, you have to consider the effects on climate change and the environment.”
Michael Wernick, former clerk of the Privy Council, pointed out that climate change was also not a huge factor in the federal election.
Mandate letters, generally speaking, are a relatively new development in the last couple of decades, and they weren't made public before then, Brock said.
Former prime minister Justin Trudeau was the first federal leader to publicly publish mandate letters for each individual minister, complete with specific instructions and policy expectations. Having a written record of what the federal government said it would accomplish was a step forward for transparency and accountability, May said. She hopes Carney will make individual mandate letters public or release more information.
Mandate letters are definitely a tool for communicating political and policy priorities, but more so, they are used for “tasking and traffic control,” Wernick told Canada’s National Observer in a phone interview. They help set clear expectations for ministers to prevent confusion “or turf wars and ego issues about who's in charge,” he said.
Publishing a single, blanket mandate letter for the whole government marks a significant departure from Trudeau — “and that may be the whole point of it,” May said.
Brock and Wernick agree it signals a different approach to managing the cabinet.
Carney’s letter said his ministers are “expected and empowered to lead, and to bring new ideas, clear focus, and decisive action” to their work. Over the coming weeks, he will get cabinet members to “identify the key goals and measures of success” to evaluate the results of their work.
“He has set the tone very clearly: ministers are going to be guiding the departments, but they will report to him, and he will be following what they're doing,” Brock said.
“It's much more along the line of a CEO for a corporation than some of the cabinets we've seen in the past.”
For example, in a company, vice presidents are in charge of particular departments, but ultimately they respond to the central mandate and what the top is directing them to do, Brock said.
Brock isn’t convinced a lack of public, specific mandate letters is a huge loss to transparency, and said it may even help cabinet work together.
One of the political problems with public, detailed mandate letters is that ministers have to respond to those priorities, and the media, public and opposition parties are all going to do their jobs of holding the government to account on those priorities, she said.
“But often, circumstances can change, and one priority can rise up, or one that you thought was going to be important isn't this important, and then it looks like you're walking things back, or ministers get very criticized for not making every priority count to the same level.”
She said the strength of this approach is a certain efficiency, but also transparency in the sense that the prime minister is accepting accountability.
Carney’s list of seven priorities is fairly directional but “set at a level of generality that they've got lots of room to fill in the detail, and that'll be the challenge for them,” Wernick said.
“They have a lot of work to do to turn this into laws, policies, regulations [and] specific action,” he said.
The same day Carney released the mandate letter, the Conservative Party announced its shadow cabinet of 48 shadow ministers and 14 associate shadow ministers.
“We will work with the government to put an end to unfair American tariffs or to pass good laws — but we will fight hard when the government is wrong,” Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said in the press release. The statement said new MPs will be shuffled into roles in the fall and winter.
The NDP and Bloc Qébécois did not respond to a request for comment.
Natasha Bulowski / local Journalism Initiative / Canada’s National Observer
Comments
Office of the Prime Minister: Mandate Letter, May 21, 2025
"Canada must build an enormous amount of new infrastructure at speeds not seen in generations. This includes the infrastructure to diversify our trading relationships; to become an ENERGY SUPERPOWER IN BOTH CLEAN AND CONVENTIONAL energies; to restore affordability to housing; and to secure our borders and our communities.
"… Government itself must become much more productive by deploying AI at scale, by focusing on results over spending, and by USING SCARCE TAX DOLLARS TO CATALYSE multiples of private investment."
Translation: Massive subsidies for carbon capture, LNG, and new pipelines.
Carney is continuing in the Liberals' tradition of contradictory climate policy.
A plan to expand both renewables and conventional energy is a plan to fail on climate.
Canada is banking on global failure to address climate change.
Corporate Canada, led by Big Oil and the Big Banks that back them, have abandoned all pretensions. They stand irrevocably opposed to all climate policy and will do everything in their power to obstruct it.
Not the leadership a climate emergency calls for.
Tim Hodgson, the new federal energy minister: "Every barrel of responsibly produced Canadian oil and every kilowatt of clean Canadian power can displace less clean, riskier energy elsewhere in the world. Our exports can help our allies break dependence on authoritarian regimes and help the world reduce our emissions."
"'Energy is Canada's power': New federal energy minister touts past Alberta oilpatch ties" (CBC, May 23, 2025)
The Carney government is trafficking in the same falsehoods as previous Liberal governments — the same lies and deceptions promulgated by federal and Alberta conservatives as well as by CAPP.
"Responsibly produced oil" is a meaningless catchphrase.
There is nothing "responsible" or "ethical" about Canada's oil industry.
How could an industry that rejects, resists, and obstructs climate action be "responsible"? Canada's O&G mafia poses the greatest threat to Canadian democracy and unity.
Heavy oil from Alberta's oilsands and synthetic crude oil (SCO) are on the high end of the emissions scale. Canada's O&G industry grossly under-reports its emissions of all types.
Displacing lower-emitting crudes with Alberta's high-intensity barrels would boost global emissions, not reduce them.
Oilsands mines, smokestacks, tailings ponds, and road networks have turned the region into an ecological sacrifice zone. Imperilling the health of indigenous communities on the frontlines of "development".
What is responsible about that?
To avoid penalty, Carney's new Liberal government may wish to repeal Trudeau's "greenwashing" legislation Bill C-59.
“Unprecedented Crime: Climate Science Denial and Game Changers for Survival”, a 2018 book by Peter Carter and Elizabeth Woodward, documents the climate decisions of corporations, the press, states, and others that have led to destruction, injury and death. The legal grounds for charges are outlined; yet, as far as I know no individual has been charged and convicted of these crimes. On April 30 this year the Chief Executive Officers of fourteen Canadian oil companies wrote to the leaders of our four main political parties urging them to expedite expansion of the fossil fuel industries by eliminating any cap on carbon emissions, eliminating the carbon levy and expediting approvals. Doing these will inevitably lead to a worsening climate, more destruction, injuries and deaths. For this blatant advocation of criminal activity these executive officers should be charged with attempted homicide.
Carney should be prosecuted too if he keeps this up.
Carter and Woodward state “The strongest legal case against greenhouse gas pollution crime is the Public Trust Doctrine”. The above Canadian executives should be charged as I am doubtful that we will see serious climate progress until there are corporate officers and politicians in jail, which is where they belong.
One mandate letter facilitates the REAL change needed, which is to completely defang and thereby derail what has become the predominant political style of the conservatives that echoes the digital sewer social media has devolved into, a sewer they have both originated and perpetuated by fully mining not just the misinformation opportunities of the algorithms, but also practicing "malinformation," the newer term that conjures their malice aforethought.
By removing the focus on individual ministers, the one mandate letter will also remove what have become relentless con attacks on individuals in the name of supposed "transparency" and "accountability," their stock in trade, and let's face it, Mark Carney is simply not Trudeau.
On the climate change file we are all watching, we have to realize how the aforementioned noxious con political style that has also leaked into the media has permeated US as well. Look at the impatience, the urge to jump on anything for "a story." It's all far more complicated than that, and we have voted for new, true leadership here, so need to settle down ourselves.
This morning on an interview with Hodgson on CBC, he followed Carney's lead, and what I gleaned from the understandably noncommittal replies to questions at this point, was not just the vague phrase "energy superpower" but the phrase "clean energy superpower."
I think it will be better generally not to follow it so closely so as to revive the trust we used to have before social media stoked the absolute worst of our fragile human nature.
This is a hopeful perspective, if we forget the Liberal tendency to go with the current flow and thus remain the ruling party. It doesn't take a lot of research or deep thinking to see that the Fossil Fuel industry is back in the saddle........and they didn't need Pierre Poilievre to get them there.
Trump is obviously their man....and for peace loving, apolitical Canadians, all we care about is somehow not being annexed by him AND not being too inconvenienced by his silly tariff wars. That suddenly, in the interests of being independent from the PetroPower of the planet, we're going to double down on our own dirty oil with pipelines to nowhere going down everywhere...means the crowd Trump works for, is winning. Carney is happy to work for them too.
As a Central Banker, he will see it as mere necessity. But the trouble with the Trudeau government was not all the stuff the Tories cooked up........the trouble with the Trudeau government was it was trying to have its cake and eat it too........save the planet and buy bitumen pipelines.
Now it appears Carney has streamlined the policy............its all in on tarsands pipelines and a pause on EV build outs.
The Conservative party might have lost the election, but won the future... If we know what we should about the science and reality of climate change, that's a loss for all of us.. Not to mention the many living creatures with which we share this earth.
Ok, just because they're capable of winning a federal election means they're lesser somehow? That they're just corporate shills who "go with the flow?"
Well, interestingly, the morally superior NDP just had their usual votes divided between the Liberals AND the Cons, so which is the most progressive party then? Or as progressive as can ACTUALLY move the needle forward i.e.?