It’s a Saturday night in Churchill, and the Seaport Hotel — the only bar open in late April, owned by Mayor Mike Spence — is completely dead.
Other than a few characters hunched over video lottery terminals, it’s just me and former port worker Joe Stover. He tells me that back in 2016, just before he was laid off by the port’s former American owners OmniTRAX, this place would have been “hopping.”
Our server, Danielle Joseph, has lived in town for 16 years, including five years working at the port. She's proud that after more than 20 years of American control, the ownership is now local.
But Joseph is also wary of the “endless cycle of hype” she has witnessed over the years concerning the port's expansion.
“And I do not support oil exports from Churchill either,” she said flatly.
It’s a popular sentiment in this northern Manitoba port and tourist town of 850 people. But it flies in the face of a frenzy of development schemes swirling around Churchill since the election of Prime Minister Mark Carney and a focus on nation-building projects in response to a US-imposed trade war.
"Any oil spill could totally decimate our tourism industry," says tourism logistics coordinator Joe Stover.
Western premiers have pitched Hudson Bay as the terminus for bitumen exports through the Arctic — a new all-season road, a hub to extend hydro-grid power to the territory of Nunavut, and not least, an export point for a mineral-rich province that Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has called the “Costco of Critical Minerals.” Earlier this month, Kinew floated the idea of oil shipments via Hudson Bay.

Churchill, however, may find itself facing incompatible futures — a potential gateway to funnel western resources to non-US markets, expand resupply to remote communities, and bolster sovereignty in an ice-free Arctic. All of these would require a huge influx in shipping traffic and a surge in infrastructure building.
At the same time, it’s a remote town that earns most of its income from an ecotourism industry dependent on a pristine, unpolluted habitat for polar bears, beluga whales and 200-plus migratory bird species.

“Any oil spill could totally decimate our tourism industry,” Stover said.
He is far from an environmentalist, but Stover said the inevitability of spills from increased ship traffic and hydrocarbon exports is a huge red flag.
“A question Churchill really needs to understand is, what is the backup plan?” asked Spence, who, in addition to owning this bar/motel, runs a tourism company and co-chairs the Arctic Gateway consortium of more than 40 Indigenous and bay-line communities that took over the port and railway in 2018.
"For some people, all their families ever did was work on the rail line and the port, he said.
“We are going to have to find a balance, because tourism isn’t going to pay all the bills.”
Bears and Whales
Churchill is a global tourism destination known as the Polar Bear Capital of the World.

In 2023, Churchill-bound tourism contributed nearly $100 million to the provincial economy, with more than $21 million in tax revenue from some 25,000 visitors, many of them from the US, UK and Australia. Just under 1,400 full-time equivalent jobs were generated that year alone.
Glen Newstater works one of these jobs as a guide and logistics expert for one of the town’s biggest tourism operators.

He took me on a drive along the 25-kilometre stretch of road that is Churchill, to better understand how tourism currently shapes the town.
Driving along the frozen Hudson Bay coastline in late April, we pass the intact wreck of a ship called the MV Ithaca, and on a rocky beach near the airport, the remains of “Miss Piggy” — a cargo plane that crash-landed in 1979.
Both are famous local tourist sites, amazing to southerners because this far north the wrecks were not worth salvaging and have become permanent quirks of the landscape.
A big tourist draw is Churchill’s location beneath the aurora oval, which makes the northern lights potentially observable for 300 nights a year.
But polar bears and beluga whales are by far the biggest attractions in the summer-fall tourist season, said Newstater, whose great-great-grandmother moved to Manitoba from Iceland with 11 children in tow. His great-grandfather moved to Churchill in 1930, lured by work at the newly built port.
Tourists can be classified by niche. Photographers are a "unique breed" and come from all over the world, said Christine Lee, Glen’s partner and general manager of the Blueberry Inn.
“Some will sit for eight hours in one place to get the perfect shot.”
Not to be outdone, birders show up armed with rare species bucket lists, memorizing bird call audio recordings in advance to better identify birds.

More than a dozen major tourism companies operate from the town, with some offering beluga whale tours at the nearby confluence of the Churchill River.
Spence’s Wat’chee Expeditions is one of multiple Indigenous-owned businesses providing local cultural and historical context.
A handful of companies deliver high-end polar bear “safaris” — with their own remote lodges and attack-proof tundra buggies.
Spinoff industries include Indigenous and Inuit art, float plane services, restaurants, hotels, lodges and bars.

Americans accounted for more than 40 per cent of visitors to Churchill in 2024, compared to 29 per cent from Canada. Has the US-led tariff war and strained diplomatic relations stemmed the flow of Americans to Canada’s polar bear capital?
“No,” said Newstater, noting that 65 per cent of his high-end, polar bear safari visitors are from south of the border.
“Americans see what they want to see,” he said.
Polar bears on thin ice?
My April reporting trip coincided with a research visit by Andrew Derocher, University of Alberta biological sciences professor and one of the world’s preeminent polar bear researchers.

On the day we met to talk, he had about an hour of down-time before he boarded a helicopter with two graduate students to tranquilize and tag polar bears on the frozen Hudson Bay ice not far from town.
Derocher’s research headquarters on the outskirts of Churchill is a tourist attraction in itself — the non-profit Churchill Northern Studies Centre was built over the remains of Canada’s only rocket test site.
During the Cold War, the US and Canadian military fired rockets into the skies above the site in an effort to better understand the northern lights, a natural light display also known as the aurora borealis and caused by charged particles from the sun reaching the Earth’s atmosphere.

The same loss of sea ice that is opening the north to shipping is putting the future of local polar bears into question, Derocher said.
That’s because polar bears in this area spend all winter on the Hudson Bay ice hunting seals, their main source of sustenance. When the ice of Hudson Bay melts, they are forced onto land, where there is virtually nothing to eat.
“The [bear] population has declined by about 50 per cent in this area over the last few decades,” he said. “So there’s not as many as there used to be, but there’s still at least 600 to 700 bears in the area.”
The future of polar bears in this area is difficult to predict. “Churchill could have polar bears for another 100 years, or it could be just five years. It just depends on what happens to the sea ice," he said.

Is Derocher worried about the impact of an expanded shipping schedule on the polar bears?
“Let’s say Churchill decides to ship bitumen from Alberta, and there was a big spill," he said.
"Based on where we know that polar bears are moving, how they move, with currents, with the sea ice drift relative to wind patterns, we can say, 'OK, we think the oil is here,'" he said.
“How many bears would be likely to move through that area? How many bears might we be looking at trying to clean up and rehabilitate?”
Research conducted in the 1980s, when there was interest in offshore oil and gas development in the Beaufort Sea, included experiments in Churchill that immersed live polar bears in oil and attempted to clean them.
“They died of kidney failure,” Derocher said. “We know crude oil and polar bears don’t mix.”
Courtney knows the tourism score
When I met Courtney Hooper, manager of the Arctic Trading Co. on Churchill's main street right beside the port, the “aurora season” for watching the northern lights — a growing tourism draw that brings a lot of shoulder-season business to the store — had just ended.
The company supports dozens of regional Indigenous and Inuit artists — carvers, painters and other artisans — working in stone, antler and seal skin, walrus ivory and musk oxen hair. The latter produces the softest wool, said Hooper, holding up a knitted scarf. “It feels like wearing smoke,” she said.

There's a back room full of sewing machines where skilled local artisans make moccasins or “flippers” — a tourist favorite. Another room is stacked with animal skins and fur from coyote, wolf, beaver, silver fox, skunk, and harp and ring seal.
“We don’t want to be an oil town,” Hooper said when asked about the future of the port. “Grain and minerals would be great, though.”
Cruise ships are also promising for the future, she said, because visitors flood into town for a short period of time, spend their money, and then sail away. As of June, there are two cruise ships booked to visit Churchill in the 2025 season.
“Oil brings a new perspective,” said the Winnipeg native who manages an eco-tour company with her husband when she is not running the store.
“We have so much wildlife here in the water. If we kill off the belugas, the polar bears, how would we survive if we rely so much on tourism?”
Cooper’s concerns go beyond the environment.
“Churchill as a town cannot support largely unexpected inflows of people,” she said. “Where will all these [new workers] be living? We already have a housing situation. What will it look like if we get bigger?”
Uncertainty about the future of the port is also putting many locals in a tough situation, she said.
“People feel like they’ve been promised again and again. So many people are waiting to see if they get hired at the port, and are not doing other things.”

Back at the Seaport Hotel
Churchill was proposed as an oil export hub as recently as 2013, when OmniTRAX held community meetings which were not warmly received.
It didn’t help their case, recalled Stover, that 47 people at Lac-Megantic, Que. had just been killed by the derailment of rail cars carrying oil to market.
A life-long Churchillian, Stover straddles a line Churchill will have to cross if the port is to grow. He would consider a return to working at the port — “I’d never say never” — but is also settled in a job as a logistics coordinator for one of the town’s biggest ecotourism companies.
It’s nearing its last call at the Seaport Hotel when Michael Borden, a native of Caledon, Ont., comes into the bar to buy off-sale beer.
Now 29, he moved here a few years back to work at the airport, joined the Churchill volunteer fire department, and never left. There is no place on earth even remotely like Churchill, he said.

He described a transformative experience that made him want to stay: donning swim goggles, he stuck his head underwater near the confluence of the Churchill River and Hudson Bay, and made eye contact with a duo of belugas.
The whales did a double take and acknowledged his presence with genuine curiosity. Dozens of belugas at this moment were communicating through a cacophony of whistles and song as he looked on.
“You can’t put a price on that experience,” he said, walking out of the bar.
Comments
It seems the challenges ahead for Churchill are immense. Development seems inevitable. Controlling development is essential.
If there is any community in Canada that requires exceptionally careful physical planning, Churchill is it. I'd say the entire North should be incuded in any planning process now that Arctic ports are on the agenda.
In the 70s the Berger Commission, authorized by the elder Trudeau as PM, concluded that a proposed gas pipeline in the North should be put on hold until Inuit and Dene land claims are resolved. There is still no pipe 50+ years later.
Put that courageous decision in today's "pipelines to all directions" and "build pipelines or we'll break up the country" mentality of today, and the weak kneed fear of challenging that deluded hubris.
In my opinion, oil will ruin everything in such a pristine environment. I suspect that opinion forms a strong but as yet silent majority throughout the Arctic.
If there is planned control over economic development in the North, copying and pasting last century's rip & ship resource extraction model should not part if it. 21st Century planning processes are far more environmentally and culturally aware.
This brings up a few questions. What aspirations should Churchill define for its betterment? What is the level of risk Northern communities will need to endure, and what is the cutoff point for unacceptable risk? What would a modern, environmentally and economically prosperous Churchill look like? What would be the ideal model for all Arctic communitues to aspire to as development pressure mounts?
It seems logical to conclude that renewable electricity and dry shipped cargo with positive long range demand growth forecasts like grain and minerals will dominate as time passes. Electrification of the railway and 100% of all building energy makes sense, and these are possible initiatives today. Putting swaths of the town under cover to save energy and building clusters of multi-family complexes with central distributed power and heat and deep recycling should become standard practice in future.
Economically, exporting finished products will be far more beneficial to the country than exporting raw resources (and therein jobs and value) overseas. Minerals and metals need to be processed at home. Better yet, as one example, ship finished batteries and other manufactured goods, not their individual components. Ditto Canadian knowledge and expertise.
Foreign industries wanting the raw product shipped out of Canada need to be kept away from susceptable politicians who are dazzled by donations and therefore easily placed under their thumb.
Canada and Canadians need to accept that our industrial economic models need to be cleaned up and modernized, and to accept the costs of doing so. There is now ample evidence in the world econony that there is no long range future for raw bitumen and LNG exports.
There is a parallel to BC's recent decision to give a ferry building contract to a big Chinese shipyard. No Canadian shipyard provided a bid because they were already busy with federal DND and Coast Guard ship building contracts, and they knew their bids would not compete with China's heavily subsidized industry (the Chinese government owns the shipyard) and lower labour standards. As such, BC Ferries will pay less overall up front, but lose the long term jobs and multipliers circulating for years locally if BC and the feds invested more in shipbuilding at home. Moreover, we could also make our own green steel as part of a long term national vision of building out green infrastructure for decades to come.
Investing locally creates wealth and good permanent jobs, but Canada needs to shake off the beancounter's "cheaper is better" mentality first and foremost, a mentality that sells the store and opens the warehouse to foreign pillagers, not to mention putting communities at risk of environmental damage and ignoring the challenges of climate change.
Churchill could, if the planners really focus, do it better and bolder. The first bold move could be to reject the export of fossil fuels as a service to humanity and the natural world.
Energi Media just posted a great video interview of two experts on the energy transition in today's context of political instability. It's a bit over nine minutes, and well worth watching while thinking about Churchill and other Northern communities that are opening up.
"...geopolitical risk a major boost to transitioning away from oil and gas."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIMGEzOc_oY