You can make a difference.
Female politicians from all parties have come to former federal justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould’s defence after anonymous Trudeau government insiders labelled her difficult to work with and self-centred — an attack one Conservative calls a “disgusting” and sexist character assassination.
Wilson-Raybould — Canada’s first Indigenous attorney general — is at the centre of a political scandal sparked by a Globe and Mail report that someone in the Prime Minister’s Office pressed her to stop the prosecution of Quebec engineering giant SNC-Lavalin on fraud and corruption charges.
A report by The Canadian Press exploring the relationship between Wilson-Raybould and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office quoted a handful of anonymous government sources saying for example, that she “had become a thorn in the side of the cabinet,” and was “difficult to get along with, known to berate fellow cabinet ministers openly at the table, and who others felt they had trouble trusting.”
The report said these were cited as among the reasons Wilson-Raybould was demoted to the veterans affairs portfolio in a recent cabinet shuffle. They noted too that she had four chiefs of staff in three-and-a-half years and “only showed up to meetings when she felt like it,” according to the report by The Canadian Press.
“She’s always sort of been in it for herself,” said one anonymous insider to The Canadian Press. “It’s never been about the government or the cabinet. Everything is very Jody-centric.”
Politicians on both sides of the aisle have rallied behind Wilson-Raybould, suggesting overt sexism in these comments.
As someone on the inside, who knows @Puglaas, I can tell you that she is fierce, smart and unapologetic. When women speak up and out, they are always going to be labelled. Go ahead. Label away. We are not going anywhere. #IAmWithHer #StandUp #ISeeYou https://t.co/BQWeiitn9R— Celina Caesar-Chavannes (@iamcelinacc) February 11, 2019
“As someone on the inside, who knows (Wilson-Raybould), I can tell you that she is fierce, smart and unapologetic,” Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes wrote on Twitter. “When women speak up and out, they are always going to be labelled. Go ahead. Label away. We are not going anywhere.”
Conservative MP Michelle Rempel characterized the anonymous comments as “disgusting.” In several tweets, Rempel highlighted different expectations faced by male and female politicians, and took issue with the attacks on Wilson-Raybould’s work ethic, especially as they came from officials in a “feminist” government.
“If ‘she’s in it for herself’ … equates to ‘she stood up and did the right thing.’ then way to go,” Rempel tweeted. However, she said the accusations appear gendered in nature.
1/ Thread. The character assassination our “feminist in chief” has launched on @Puglaas in this read is DISGUSTING. Through this we know that women in Trudeaus gender cabinet are measured by their ability to sit back and shut up or spout dogma. https://t.co/RrmCK5e5D9— Michelle Rempel Garner (@MichelleRempel) February 9, 2019
Several academics who research women in politics told National Observer they also see gender bias at play.
Research shows that when women’s behavior runs counter to feminine stereotypes, women are penalized, said Erin Tolley, an assistant political science professor at the University of Toronto, whose work focuses on the intersection of race, gender and politics.
“I think if you had a male cabinet minister in the same position, you would see a different scenario,” Tolley said.
Jean Golden, a sociology professor at Ryerson University, noted that Trudeau has accepted strong women working for him. She expects Trudeau would have investigated allegations that she’s difficult to work with to determine “whether this was being based upon her being strong or...whether there was some sexism happening inside among employees.”
There is always discrimination when females “step outside the expected leadership behaviours for females,” Golden said, adding that she questions the implication that Wilson-Raybould was demoted because she was difficult, considering that she had a strong reputation as an Indigenous woman with great education and experience.
Every woman who’s ever been called “bitchy” or “difficult” or not a “team player” should re-tweet this tweet. The blatant sexism in the anonymous attacks against this powerful woman, @Puglaas, is shameful. #cdnpoli #bcpoli #persist https://t.co/12F5GHqV7f— Lisa Kirbie (@lisakirbie) February 10, 2019
Peggy Nash, a former NDP Member of Parliament from Toronto, has seen the gendered differences in politics at play. “A man can be assertive, but a woman will be difficult and demanding in perceived leadership because our stereotypes are predominantly male,” Nash said in an interview.
People don’t really understand how deeply seated some stereotypes are in politics, she added. “Just because the prime minister creates a gender equal caucus doesn't mean we have a gender equal country,” Nash said. “In fact I think we're very, very far away from that.”
“If the implication is that all politicians should be selfless and without ego, show me politicians, male or female, who are compliant with that.”
As her counterpart in Veteran’s Affairs for Ontario and as Women’s Minister I’m with her. https://t.co/xJ7PSjEZ3w— Lisa MacLeod (@MacLeodLisa) February 10, 2019
Penny Collenette, a former political official in Jean Chretien’s Liberal government, said in an email that “someone who is difficult is often code for ‘not a team player.’ In other words she (or he) is playing with a different set of rules or values. Perhaps even a different moral compass.”
Collenette said that “difficult” had often been used “to describe strong women, especially when they were alone in the crowd,” which seems to be the case with Wilson-Raybould.
“It’s always the case,” agreed Olivia Chow, a former NDP MP. She added that the attacks on Wilson-Raybould are a distraction from focusing on the real issue at hand: “was there any obstruction of justice?”