Read the news in recent months, and it is impossible to avoid conservative attacks claiming climate policies make people poorer. From Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre attacking the carbon tax as the cause of high food prices to Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim saying his failed proposal to eliminate the city's groundbreaking ban on natural gas heating was about "affordability," efforts to link climate initiative to the cost of living crisis are common.
The claim isn't fully true. Climate action is expensive for both individuals and society, but less than the cost of doing nothing. In some cases (think heat pumps), it's cheaper. And climate change is fuelled by the wealthy, even as marginalized and working-class communities are hit harder by the crisis.
Those nuances are ignored by conservatives who use anti-climate rhetoric to boost their popularity. U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent win and Poilievre’s popularity are due, in part, to their anti-climate stance. Class and wealth are often ignored in the discourse around climate politics. That intersection will be the topic of discussion at two upcoming roundtable discussions organized by the University of Toronto's Institute for Environment, Conservation, and Sustainability, in partnership with Canada's National Observer and Another Story bookstore.
"It's not just that climate change affects livelihoods differently," said Imre Szeman, the institute's director. "Class also affects decision-making: who gets to make those decisions, who gets to identify what matters and what should be addressed more more quickly."
The first panel, on March 6, will examine how those differences shape the impact of climate change on vulnerable and low-income communities. The goal, Szeman said, is to show how people’s experience of climate change is dictated by their circumstances. For instance, a lot of reporting on the January fires in Los Angeles painted people who lost their homes with the same brush, when in reality, victims who were relatively well-off and had their homes insured face fewer challenges than those who don't, he said. Highlighting these differences and wrapping them into climate activism and policy is key to a more just transition, he explained.
Moderated by media and environmental studies expert Hannah Tollefson, the panel brings together:
- Angele Alook, a professor of gender, sexuality, and women's studies at York University, and member of the Bigstone Cree Nation in Treaty 8 territory. Her research has examined the Indigenous experiences in Alberta's oil industry and its gendered impact on working families. Her on-going work is examining a just transition for Alberta's labour force and the impact of climate change on Treaty 8 territory.
- Geoff Dembicki, an investigative journalist with DeSmog who has specialized in fossil fuel industry disinformation. He is the author of The Petroleum Papers, an exploration of historical disinformation about Alberta's oil sands that was named best non-fiction book of the year by The Washington Post in 2022.
- Zamani Ra, founder of CEED Canada, an organization that helps communities, like universities or social housing stakeholders, take climate action. The organization focuses on highlighting people’s lived experiences to shape climate activism and policy change.
- Matt Huber is a professor of geography and environment at Syracuse University in upstate New York. His research focuses on how capitalism and energy interact with the politics of climate change.
The second panel, on March 7, will delve deeper into class and climate in the "age of Trump." Featuring Matt Huber, from Syracuse University, and Myles Lennon, an environmental anthropologist at Brown University. Lennon's work examines how rooftop solar, microgrids and other climate resilience infrastructure impact power structures as they proliferate across New York City. He also worked in sustainable energy for eight years before starting his Phd.
The discussion will focus on how class and race impacts people's political influence and ability to access resources to adapt to the problem or push for change, Szeman said. Building on the panel around vulnerability, Huber and Lennon will examine how socio-economic status influences the extent to which people can modify their lifestyles for the climate or influence societal responses to the problem.
"At a personal level, it costs money to be virtuous with respect to the climate," Szeman explained, citing for instance the higher cost of eating organic foods or replacing electric appliances. But at a societal level, the investments in cleaner infrastructure or regulations setting more environmental pollution standards can reduce prices for everyone – if people can convince politicians to make the shift.
"That doesn't happen often because they're cynical, or they don't worry about your experience compared to other people's, or they have other political goals," he said.
The events will also be livestreamed here.
Marc Fawcett-Atkinson, reporter
Top Story
🤝 U.S. President Donald Trump and his shifting threats of tariffs and annexation have Canadians in a lather, and for good reason. From oil and gas to critical minerals needed for computer power and the clean energy transition, Canada is blessed with a bounty that the U.S. would dearly love to control. They’ve been reasonably reliable trading partners until now, but Trump has blown up the status quo. Canadian political leaders are now consumed with efforts to negotiate a peaceful end to a trade war we did not start. Even if a deal is made, the last month of chaos drives home the need to husband and control our resources, so we are less reliant on a partner we can no longer trust.
John Woodside and Darius Snieckus report
Quote of the week
“It’s good for the environment, it’s a great cardio workout, and it keeps you healthy”: Montreal’s Adrian Niculcea on why he braves the snow and cold to ride his e-bike year round.
MORE CNO READS
🚰Sometimes, if you know something is wrong, you shouldn't wait for permission to fix it. That was the conclusion reached by Sébastien Sauvé, a professor of environmental chemistry at University of Montreal who was worried about dangerous chemicals in Quebec’s drinking water. He knew if he asked for permission to test for PFAS, more commonly known as “forever chemicals,” he would likely face constraints on sharing his research. So, he mounted a stealth campaign, collecting water in plastic bottles from public sinks and fountains. His hunch about contamination proved correct. Yet, provincial governments have failed to adopt stricter Health Canada guidelines for the chemicals that are linked to reproductive problems, developmental effects in children, increased risk of several cancers, and weakening of the immune system, including reduced vaccine response.
Leah Borts-Kuperman reports
⚒️There’s been lots of talk about the need for Canada to stockpile minerals like lithium and copper to use as leverage against U.S. President Donald Trump’s economic and sovereignty threats. But simply digging them out of the ground and storing them won’t help if we don’t have the wherewithal to process them. Francisca Quinn, chair of the ESG committee at Canada Nickel Co, summed up the problem. “Currently, we have to send our nickel abroad for processing in Asia and then, ship it back to put it in a battery plant in Ontario. That doesn’t make a lot of sense.” She and other mining experts are calling for a cross-country network of processing facilities to turn our valuable natural resources into usable commodities.
Darius Snieckus reports
❓The days of the basement suite may be numbered. At a time when climate change is causing more extreme rainfall events and costly floods, some Canadian municipalities are questioning whether it makes sense to keep building homes with basements. In Quebec last August, just one powerful storm, Hurricane Debby, caused an unprecedented $2.5 billion in insured damage. Montreal’s Ville-Marie borough on the Saint Lawrence River, last year passed a bylaw banning basement dwellings in new buildings in flood-prone areas. Municipal authorities are also taking other rainwater-management steps, including the use of plants to act as sponges that absorb rainwater and drainage upgrades.
Cloe Logan writes.
👑American billionaires are kneeling at the feet of President Trump, who seems out to destroy much of the progress his country has made decarbonizing energy supplies and lowering carbon emissions. Take for example, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, whose $10-billion climate and biodiversity fund has stopped supporting one of the world’s most important climate certification organisations. The Bezos Earth Fund pulled support for the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), an international body that assesses if companies are decarbonizing in line with the Paris Agreement. Advisers at the organization fear the freeze indicates a broader trend of wealthy individuals moving away from giving money to causes that Trump does not agree with.
Phoebe Weston, of The Guardian, one of our Climate Desk partners, reports