Betrayed. Angry. And above all, anxious. That’s the general feeling among Canadians this week as the U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods kicked in.
A good friend of mine, a usually unflappable high-placed business person, woke up to a panic attack Monday morning. Another friend’s blood pressure spiked and has been put on medication until it calms down. Yet another friend found herself in tears when the house next to her was knocked down for redevelopment. There was nothing special about the house, and she later acknowledged it was the state of the world making her feel as though “everything is being wrecked.”
Like me, literally everyone I’ve talked to over the past few weeks has had some 4 a.m. sleepless ruminations about our powerful friend turned world enemy. These are not unreasonable fears.
There are enormous economic concerns, of course. The prospect of thousands of jobs lost and a massive recession is reason enough for worry.
On Thursday, Trump paused some of the tariffs, promising to bring them back in April if his unclear and ever-changing demands aren’t met — a partial reprieve that somehow manages to breed even more uncertainty and economic turmoil.
But the possibility that this could be much more than a trade war — the prospect that what U.S. President Donald Trump actually wants is to expand his territory with a takeover of Canada — is ramping up stress to a new level. Our prime minister is not ruling it out.
At the moment, anger is pulling us together. It feels like those early days in the pandemic when neighbours banged pots and pans to applaud health officials and posted signs in the windows saying “Be Kind.”
But I worry our current consensus, once the full economic effect of the tariffs take hold, will crumble and backfire just as the buy-in for pandemic safety measures did. Mandatory pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates ultimately did more to divide Canadians than all past squabbles over taxes, trade or foreign policy put together.
We saw it with the so-called “Freedom Convoy,” an ugly protest that shut down an Ottawa neighbourhood for three weeks. We saw it with death threats against RCMP officers policing the borders. And we’ve seen it playing out in our political dynamic.
The popularity of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who hobnobbed with the convoy protestors, soared in the years following the pandemic. Canada’s convoy protest was a far cry from the assault on Capitol Hill following Trump’s loss in 2021. But the undercurrent of anger, loss of faith in government, and mistrust of science among Poilievre supporters mirrors those of Americans who voted Trump back in for a second term. And now, here we are with an American president using on-again, off-again tariff threats to sow divisiveness among his closest trading partners, and potentially Canada’s provinces. This is a pivotal moment where infighting could threaten our existence as a nation.
Canada is a huge country made up of provinces with radically different interests. Ontario is a manufacturing hub that stands to lose hundreds of thousands of jobs, many in the automotive industry, because of the tariffs. Alberta depends on oil exports and will resist any efforts to use their resource as a bargaining chip. If a deal can not be struck with Trump on the tariffs and the trade war escalates, it’s hard to see how oil, our most lucrative export, can be left out of the equation.
When people lose jobs, income and security, they lose hope and look for someone to blame. Right now, Canadians are pointing the finger at Trump. But that could easily turn and Trump’s selective tariff carveouts could provide the divide-and-conquer strategy that leads us to blame each other.
There is a better way. With resolve, we can stand shoulder-to-shoulder and resist Trump’s attempts to further divide us. There are some positive signs. Poilievre’s combative, dismissive style seems to be wearing thin and polls suggest Canadians are now leaning toward the Liberals led by Mark Carney, who is seen as a leader who can bargain with Trump and unite the country rather than exploit the fissures already dividing us.
Impromptu boycotts against U.S. food and manufactured goods are picking up steam and Canadians are cancelling travel plans south of the border. The Canadian flag, co-opted by the convoy supporters as a symbol of protest, is flying in huge numbers on homes, vehicles, and businesses. Its message has shifted. Now it feels again like a symbol of solidarity, pride in Canada and our resolve to keep our country intact.
Adrienne Tanner - Editor-in-Chief
Top Story
Premier Doug Ford is taking a big chance by using power as a way to push back against the U.S. tariffs. Canadian and American electrical grids are connected north and south across the border in a number of provinces, allowing the two countries to buy and sell power from each other, depending on supply, demand and pricing. Ontario, whose manufacturing sector will be hard hit if the tariffs stick, has announced a 25 per cent surcharge on all electricity sold to the U.S. and threatened to cut power sales off completely if the tariffs are not abandoned. Experts say this is a risky move because the U.S. considers electricity to be critical infrastructure by the U.S. Cutting off the supply could be interpreted as an attack.
Quote of the week
"Now, it's not in my habit to agree with the Wall Street Journal, but Donald, they point out that even though you're a very smart guy, this is a very dumb thing to do," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, on the first day the U.S. tariffs took effect.
MORE CNO READS
👏🏽Chalk up another North American clean energy first for Canada. Seven giant wind turbines — the continent’s largest — are under construction in the small town of Mulgrave, Nova Scotia. Each turbine will produce enough electricity to power 2,000 homes. The Goose Harbour Lake wind project will help power the region, including Port Hawkesbury Paper, a local pulp and paper mill that accounts for up to 25 per cent of the provincial grid's peak demand. Wind power is, of course, a true renewable and the more of it Canada produces, the closer we get to meeting our emission reduction goals.
Darius Snieckus reports
💐Kudos to Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who hit all the right notes the day the U.S. tariffs were imposed. Ford came out swinging, saying, “I want to inflict as much pain as we possibly can until we get to a deal.” Ford halted all U.S. liquor sales and banned companies based in the U.S. from bidding on government procurement and infrastructure projects with price tags in the billions. And in another strategic blow, Ford tanked Ontario’s $100-million deal with Elon Musk’s company Starlink for internet service to isolated communities. Ford has to hit back hard against the tariffs which will cause terrible harm to Ontario’s automobile and manufacturing sector. His aggressive plan is the only sane response to our southern aggressor.
David Moscrop writes
🔙 Only a few months ago, the prospect of the federal Liberals winning the next election was laughable. Even Liberal strategists thought it impossible that the Liberals could overcome the popularity of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who has led the polls by a large margin for months, if not years. But everything changed after Christmas when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned and Mark Carney entered the Liberal leadership race. Now the two parties are tied and many people believe Carney is better suited to tackle fallout from the trade war started by the U.S. President Donald Trump. A Liberal victory is far from certain, but it is now within the realm of possibility.
Andrew Perez writes
👍🏼The federal government has taken an important first step to rein in the use of PFAS, a class of dangerous substances commonly known as ‘forever chemicals’. Canada announced it will add most Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) to Canada’s list of toxic substances. PFAS linger in the environment and even small doses can harm kidneys, thyroid, reproduction, nervous and immune systems and metabolism. The chemicals, which repel water and grease, are used in makeup, cookware, outdoor clothing and firefighting foam among many other applications. This is part of a greater plan to reduce the use of PFAS chemicals in Canada. The next step will be limiting the use in firefighting foam.
Marc Fawcett-Atkinson reports