First, let’s get one thing straight: anyone who owns a Cybertruck knew precisely what they were buying and who they were buying it from: it’s a MAGA hat on wheels.
The Cybertruck has only been available for purchase since well after Elon Musk made his extreme far-right views known through his public statements and his actions, including turning Twitter into a reactionary soup of disinformation and hate. That saga hit its crescendo a full year before the first Cybertrucks lumbered off the line like a battalion of armoured dumpsters with built-in iPhones. Cybertruck owners can spare me their complaints that they don’t understand where the hate comes from. They bought it.
I have more time for the objections of people who bought Teslas in years prior. The cars were the first good-looking, functional and luxurious electric cars, so the well-heeled and eco-minded early adopters are victims in all of this — to a point. Because the problems Tesla has inflicted on all of us go beyond Musk’s current-day destructive meltdown.
For nearly a decade now, as Musk has scrambled to deliver on his repeated promise of fully autonomous vehicles — a promise his outlandish stock valuation depends on — the rest of us have been made the unwitting guinea pigs in his beta testing. Some have paid dearly, mangled by cars operating what amounts to fancy cruise control. We didn’t sign up for this; Tesla owners chose to subject us to it.
Most bought those vehicles before Musk announced his support for Trump last summer and set about buying the election for him, before Musk began to dismantle the functioning of the U.S. government, before he said Canada is “not a real country” as we face the greatest threat to our sovereignty in our history. Most, but not all.
Regardless of when people bought their Teslas, they are all now caught up in the cumulative rage that Musk has built up against himself, which is boiling over in the form of protests and vandalism. That’s unfortunate for the owners stuck with dirty looks and rude gestures, since many bought them as a way to lower their carbon footprints and demonstrate that luxury and environmentalism aren’t necessarily incompatible.
But the protests are serving an important purpose. The used market has been flooded with Teslas, thanks in no small part to the inverse status symbol they’ve become. That in turn influences the market for new ones, which is what Musk’s fortune relies on. Diminishing his wealth and status diminishes his ability to inflict harm on the rest of the world.
The protests have also spurred our government into action. It’s rare for the feds to take aim at a specific company outside of the justice system, but just this week Chrystia Freehand announced Tesla would not be eligible for future rebate programs (which until now have made them much more affordable), and froze millions in suspicious rebates the company claimed as the current EV subsidy program was winding down.
Freeland should go farther. In her run for leadership of the Liberal Party, she promised a 100 per cent tariff on Teslas, and she should deliver on that promise as minister of transportation, or even ban new sales outright. It would be a clear way to strike at the rotten core of the Trump administration and send a message to its biggest financial backer: we see you. It would prevent Musk’s long-awaited “robotaxis” from scaling up the carnage of the Full Self Drive scam in Canada. It would prevent more Cybertrucks from getting stuck on our snowy streets, plowing into our people and infrastructure, and scattering their glued-on panels on our highways.
She should also broaden the action British Columbia has taken in banning Tesla chargers from its charger rebate program. When the Zero Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Program opens its next round of funding for public and business-based chargers, Tesla should not be eligible for those either. Why should we put a penny in Musk’s pocket as he denies our government’s legitimacy?
It’s not as though there aren’t competitors, many of whom offer better products at better prices. Some, like Polestar, are even appealing to Tesla owners directly.
As for the few remaining prospective Tesla buyers in Canada, they can still go buy them south of the border. They probably feel more at home there, anyway.
Top Story
🚗 Tesla has built its success on the back of government subsidies. Now, in Canada, it’s excluded from them. Citing a rash of suspicious payments to Tesla dealerships, transport minister Chrystia Freeland axed the company from future EV subsidy programs while freezing payment of the $43 million in suspicious claims. Those subsidies were claimed immediately after the government announced it was winding down its incentive program, and the sheer volume being demanded drained the remaining cash from the program — which should have lasted months — in a span of days. It’s just one action governments have taken against Musk in recent weeks.
Abdul Matin Sarfraz reports.
Quote of the week
“I still love it, but now I’m afraid of driving it.” — Maureen Palmer, a Tesla owner about her complicated feelings since Elon Musk’s actions have cratered the carmaker’s popularity and led to protests.
MORE CNO READS
👎🏽Alberta Premier Danielle Smith kicked up her sycophantic courtship of U.S. President Donald Trump to another level last night during an appearance with American conservative influencer Ben Shapiro. Smith and Shapiro discussed ways to help Canada elect “solid allies” to the Trump administration, which, it must be noted, started a potentially devastating trade war with Canada and is threatening our very sovereignty. An audio recording of the event was obtained by DeSmog and Canada’s National Observer. Smith, for her part, promised to keep Canadian oil flowing to the U.S. Given Smith’s recent trips to the United States and reticence to cooperate with the federal government and other Canadian premiers on a unified trade strategy, you really have to wonder who’s side she’s on.
Geoff Dembicki from DeSmog reports
🎤 A weeks-old interview resurfaced to shake up the federal election just as it began. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith spoke with Breitbart, an American far-right network, in early March, and what she said has dogged Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre ever since: “The perspective that Pierre would bring would be very much in sync with, I think … the new direction in America,” she said, referring to the Trump administration, adding that she had asked the White House to pause tariffs during the election in order to benefit Poilievre’s campaign.
Max Fawcett writes.
📝 Ontario has received a failing grade on conservation, while Quebec passed with flying colours. Ontario’s multifaceted effort to bypass or eliminate restrictions on development, particularly around the Greenbelt and the Ring of Fire, has attracted the ire of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. The environmental NGO released its annual report card this week, awarding Quebec an A- — top of the class — for its big strides to protect more of its land and water, and its inclusive and transparent process to choose new areas to conserve.
Abdul Matin Sarfraz reports.
They say Canada has no “Canadian Dream,” and that the Canadian federation is too full of infighting to be saved. While the vast majority of Canadians outright reject Donald Trump’s threats to annex Canada, there is a small but vocal group that endorses the idea. They say they’ll never be able to buy a home here, and that there would be more economic opportunities for them as Americans. Support for that idea is highest in Alberta — 15 per cent of Albertans polled online said they approved.
Fakiha Baig reports.