Support journalism that lights the way through the climate crisis
OTTAWA — Newly released documents show that a federal government department asked Facebook and Twitter to delete a newspaper article that it felt contained errors — but both social-media giants denied the request.
The request to remove social-media posts that linked to an unspecified Toronto Sun article came from a director of communications on Sept. 27, 2021, according to information prepared by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
Documents say that staff at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, which reports to Parliament through the immigration minister but is otherwise an independent body, believed the article contained "serious errors of fact risking (and) undermining public confidence in the independence of the board as well as the integrity of the refugee determination system." The board did not respond to questions from The Canadian Press.
The social-media companies ultimately said that they were denying the request because the article wasn't their original content.
The Toronto Sun did not respond to a request for comment.
Paul Knox, a professor emeritus at Toronto Metropolitan University's school of journalism, said governments don't have any business telling anybody what can be published where.
The government was "totally out of their lane on this one" and needs to apologize, he said.
"You can't only have freedom of the press for people you approve of and people you consider to be right," said Knox, who also sits on the Canadian issues committee for the Canadian Journalists For Free Expression, an organization that defends the rights of journalists.
He said that while publications can be held accountable for being wrong, it doesn't entitle people to demand that something be removed from a platform.
"And the last people on Earth that would be justified in doing that would be entities of a government," he said.
The Opposition Conservatives said Tuesday that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government "cannot be trusted" to protect Canadians' right to free expression.
"No government should be able to demand that news be erased from history simply because they do not like the facts," Conservative MP Rachael Thomas said in a statement. "It is extremely concerning that the Trudeau government has sought to censor the free press through secret requests to big tech companies."
Documents tabled in Parliament detail 214 examples of Ottawa asking for social-media content to be removed between January 2020 and February 2023. Companies took down posts about half the time for reasons such as impersonation or copyright violations.
The government documents came in response to a written question from Conservative MP Dean Allison.
In another case, the Canada Revenue Agency requested that private messages be removed from Facebook Messenger after employees shared taxpayer information on the platform.
The agency said an administrator deleted the chat on June 7, 2022, but it was unclear whether Facebook deleted the messages from its servers.
"The CRA disciplined the employees involved, up to, and including, termination of employment," the documents say, and the affected taxpayers were notified and offered credit protection services. Employees were also retrained on unauthorized access and social media.
In a third case, Meta, which owns Facebook, granted a request by the government to delete an account that was impersonating former RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki and sending people fake messages.
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok and LinkedIn all complied with various requests about posts that infringed on copyright or company policies.
However, social media companies often kept up posts that the government and its departments believed were offensive.
Both Google and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, publish public reports on how often different levels of government request changes to remove posts.
Google's reporting shows that since 2011, it has received 1,347 requests from Canadian government entities — whether municipal, provincial or federal — to remove posts.
The most recent data show that between January 2022 to June 2022, Google, which also owns YouTube, removed 73 posts — mostly because of defamation, privacy and security concerns, adult content and bullying and harassment.
Meta said it restricted access to content following 2,859 requests from all levels of Canadian government between January 2022 to June 2022 for a range of reasons.
In one example, the company said it restricted access to two posts that responded to Health Canada consumer policy reports on unsafe health practices.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 11, 2023.
Meta funds a limited number of fellowships that support emerging journalists at The Canadian Press.
Keep reading
"Documents say that staff at
"Documents say that staff at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, which reports to Parliament through the immigration minister but is otherwise an independent body, believed the article contained "SERIOUS ERRORS OF FACT RISKING (AND) UNDERMINING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE BOARD as well as THE INTEGRITY OF THE REFUGEE DETERMINATION SYSTEM." Which political side/party employs this strategy routinely, particularly the "undermining public confidence" thing and the "serious errors of fact" thing?
The right wing of course which just brazenly marches right in proud boy style using not only the same strategies but also the same expressions, even though they're dead giveaways, the word "freedom" being one. Like the "Canadian Journalists for Free Expression," a small organization staffed by volunteers fighting the good fight to "defend the rights of journalists" as if we lived in Russia or China for gawd's sake. And the article in question was from the "Toronto SUN," another giveaway, the right wing working man's newspaper that doesn't pussyfoot around like the also right wing Globe and Mail.
Paul Knox is quoted. Affiliated with the aforementioned CJFE and professor emeritus at Toronto Metropolitan University, the former Ryerson Polytechnic Institute which ranks third in the city, gives himself away by saying in truly ignorant, grandstanding Elon Musk style, "You can't only have freedom of the press for people you approve of and people you consider to be right." As if this was a new, burning issue here. And "governments don't have any business telling anybody what can be published where," even if the article casually undermines one of THEIR departments apparently. And the blistering libertarian contempt shines right through in "the last people on EARTH that would be justified in doing that (demanding something be removed from a platform on social media i.e.) would be entities of a government." Again, like we're in Russia where the Cons say that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government "cannot be trusted" to protect Canadian's right to FREE expression, despite his mentor father being responsible for the "Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms."
And then the complete idiot Rachael Thomas, my MP unfortunately, is quoted. She has been a conservative minister of women who is against women's right to choose.
And then some spotty, general statistics on government requests for items to be removed from social media are listed, one being where Meta "granted a request by the government to delete an account that was impersonating former RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki and sending people fake messages." That's openly egregious, specific, and would clearly have been perpetrated by a conservative because they are the ones who do that, not the Liberals or NDP, which should be mentioned repeatedly but never is, so the cons will keep doing it because it's not up to the media to call them out, right? Uh, except it IS supposed to be them doing that, is it NOT? So the result is that many people just assume deep faking is what ALL politicians routinely do. Good job.
Good old middle of the road Canadian Press upholding journalistic objectivity and integrity because it's their guiding principle and has been working SO well.
Comments