This story was originally published by Slate and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
Richard Kirby, a marine biologist based in Plymouth, England, was looking at zooplankton wriggling under a microscope when he spotted something else: shreds of plastic pieces interlaced with the tiny creatures.
This wasn’t unusual to Kirby. He’d collected the sample off the sea of Plymouth for the purpose of raising awareness about microplastic pollution in oceans. Examining plankton is routine for Kirby, and so is observing microplastics in his samples.
Plastic pollution in oceans has been increasing at an alarming rate over the years. According to the World Wildlife Fund, 88 per cent of marine species have been affected by plastic contamination.
People are familiar with seabirds dying from eating cigarette lighters or turtles suffocating as a result of mistaking plastic bags for jellyfish, but there is very little awareness about plastics that harm creatures at a smaller level, Kirby explains. Ingesting microplastic can even kill plankton, which are crucial sources of food for other marine life, including fish. This is because plankton cannot get a sufficient amount of food into their guts if they’re already occupied by little shreds of plastic.
Plastic is almost ubiquitous in oceans, and can even be found in environments that used to be considered pristine, says Kirby. “You can even find plastics in plankton samples collected in Antarctica, for example.” Plastic shreds from clothing are a significant polluter at the micro level. Microplastics can also come from tires, road markings and personal care products.
What people are reading
Plankton aren’t mistaking microplastics for food, exactly, says Bill Perry, an associate professor of biology at Illinois State University. They are filter-feeding, during which they extract small pieces of food and particles from the water. In doing so, they gather up microplastics, too.
The damage that microplastics cause is not just confined to microscopic marine organisms like plankton. In fact, it is more pronounced in species that are higher in the food chain, explains Perry, and which eat smaller creatures that have themselves consumed microplastics. In 2020, Perry conducted a study that examined the presence of microplastics in two different fish species in drinking water reservoirs that belonged to McLean County in Illinois. Perry’s research group collected 96 fish and detected microplastics in all of them. “The fish seemed to be swimming in essentially a soup of microplastics in the reservoirs,” he says.
Eating microplastics, as you might imagine, is not very good for marine animals. Fishes can face problems with growth and reproduction, says Grace Saba, an associate professor who also researches organismal ecology at Rutgers University. Their guts start to have more and more plastic and less food, and they don’t have enough energy to put toward growth and reproduction like they would if they weren’t eating microplastics.
The microplastic problem is only going to get worse: A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency projects that the amount of microplastics in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean will rise by 3.9 times in 2030 as compared to the microplastics level in 2008 in the region.
Once microplastics enter the ocean’s food chain, it’s hard for them to leave. Individual animals may excrete microplastics, but “the thing about poop in the ocean is that it serves as a food source for marine animals, including plankton and filter feeders,” Saba explains. In this way, microplastics get continuously recycled. Marine scientists in the future will probably be spotting microplastics in their samples, too.
One "solution" to the problem
One "solution" to the problem of plastics in the environment is degradable plastics. Unfortunately most plastics are made from fossil fuels, so when they degrade they just add more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
On the plus side, sort of, I
On the plus side, sort of, I've seen other articles saying that certain bacteria and fungi are starting to eat plastic. Not as in accidentally get it stuck in their insides, as in digest it, break it down, use it as an energy source. And they seem to be getting better at it.
So the good news is, there's a decent chance this whole microplastics problem will eventually just go away as life learns to use it for fuel. The mixed news is, guess which civilization is going to suddenly find plastics a much less durable material? Which will reduce the incentive to use plastics for everything in the first place, but still, I'm not looking forward to the first time my electrician says "Oh, your wiring's starting to get shorts because the insulation's all moldy!"