Support journalism that lights the way through the climate crisis

Goal: $100k
$22,050

With smoke-filled skies blanketing Canadian communities, air quality is top of mind. The oil and gas industry has a role in creating wildfire conditions. But it’s important to recognize that fossil fuel extraction affects air quality and human health in more ways than one.

Methane — a powerful greenhouse gas that “hits the climate hard and fast” by warming the atmosphere 84 times as much as carbon dioxide on a 20-year time scale — is widely recognized as a serious climate change contributor and a “low-hanging” opportunity to economically reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

But methane is an air-quality and health problem, too. While methane does not directly compromise air quality or harm health, it’s closely associated with toxic pollutants that do. Some are co-emitted with methane, some result from its mitigation, and some are produced by its presence in the atmosphere.

Therefore, it is imperative we take action to reduce methane emissions to combat climate change and prevent associated contamination of the breathable atmosphere and health harms.

A draft of the federal government’s new methane regulations is expected soon. Federal regulations — while critical — should be complemented with community-driven action that approaches methane as an air-quality and health issue.

Methane, air quality and health

When methane is vented or leaked during oil and gas production, transportation and storage, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hydrogen sulphide come along for the ride.

When methane is flared or combusted, black carbon (a key component of fine particulate matter), nitrogen oxides and more VOCs result.

Methane’s presence in the atmosphere also leads to the formation of ozone (one of the main constituents of smog). And its warming effect causes more frequent wildfires, which means more particulate matter in the air.

When new methane regulations are announced, they should be complemented with community-driven action that approaches the harmful gas as an air-quality and health issue, writes @amandakbryant #NetZero #GHG #methane

Each ingredient in that toxic cocktail — VOCs, hydrogen sulphide, black carbon and fine particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and ground-level ozone — is associated with severe health problems, such as preterm birth, birth defects, cancer, cardiovascular disease, nervous disorders, severe respiratory problems, diminished mental health and increased mortality. Ground-level ozone alone causes one million premature deaths per year, and methane is responsible for half of those.

Energy and climate policy researcher Amanda Bryant explains the health harms caused by air pollutants associated with methane.

International studies have shown communities situated near oil and gas infrastructure have worse air quality and worse health outcomes (not to mention billions of dollars in resulting annual health-care costs).

Research in the Canadian context is scarcer, but more is on the way. Researchers at St. Francis Xavier University (StFX) are examining air quality and health outcomes in communities close to active wells in Western Canada.

Preliminary results indicate some municipalities in regions such as Red Deer, Grande Prairie, and Lloydminster, among others, may have more exposure to harmful pollutants than other Alberta communities. An examination of health data will soon reveal whether members of those communities suffer comparatively high rates of disease.

More action needed on methane

The federal government has set significant emission reduction targets and is about to release strengthened methane regulations following a much-improved proposed regulatory framework.

Still, we can’t afford to be complacent.

Canada’s track record when it comes to meeting its climate commitments leaves a lot to be desired. No funds were earmarked in the 2023 federal budget for a promised Centre for Excellence on methane detection and elimination that could help improve Canada’s national emissions inventory, which consistently underrepresents actual emissions.

At the same time, inadequate industry compliance and ineffectual energy regulators undermine regulatory efficacy.

Existing and proposed federal policy may be strong in principle but often falls short in practice. More methane action and awareness are needed to protect Canadians from harmful associated air pollutants.

Improving air quality

Canada doesn’t have strong air-quality protections. Canada’s Ambient Air Quality Standards are considered objectives, unlike the United States, Europe, and Australia, which have legally binding ambient air-quality standards.

The provinces and territories set their own additional objectives and standards, and since they have jurisdiction over resource management and emissions from fixed sources, it falls to them to address the environmental impacts of industry.

However, when it comes to protecting local environments and human health from harmful industrial activity, the track record of the provinces is disheartening.

Some change has resulted from action taken at the community level, where the environmental and health impacts associated with methane are felt. While the burden shouldn’t fall on communities to advocate for their own well-being, community action on air quality can work, and there’s proof in Alberta.

Starting in 2008, increased heavy oil and bitumen operations in Peace River drove up emissions of methane and, correspondingly, hydrogen sulphide — also known as sour gas.

Sour gas smells strongly of rotten eggs. Residents of the area reported experiencing a host of health problems, including trouble breathing. When enough people complained to the Alberta Energy Regulator, it enacted a regulation designed to curb the noxious emissions.

Sour gas and methane emissions fell dramatically.

Community concerns — especially those of Indigenous and other racialized communities — are too often ignored. But the story of Peace River shows that, at least sometimes, if communities press hard enough on air quality, energy regulators just might act.

What communities can do

Community action to address methane and associated air pollutants can take several forms:

  1. Ask municipal officials about local policies and measures to control methane and associated pollutants from any source.
  2. Gather relevant data about the air quality in your community. Consult the National Air Pollution Surveillance Program and regional air zone reports, request local air-quality monitoring, and partner with academic researchers and Indigenous communities, which continue to experience severe and disproportionate harms from extractive industries.
  3. Join the local airshed association and take advantage of the opportunity to share information, convene stakeholders and organize community action.
  4. Advocate loudly and persistently. Armed with the knowledge of how oil and gas activities affect air quality and health, citizens can direct concerns and complaints to provincial energy regulators. Concerned citizens should also comment on the federal government’s draft regulatory framework when it is published in the Canada Gazette. It is essential to preserve its proposed stringency in the face of intense industry lobbying and weak provincial equivalency agreements.

Communities can be powerful advocates for change. And community-centred action that approaches methane as an air-quality and health issue can spur provincial and federal governments, as well as energy regulators, to follow through on methane emissions, ensure climate targets are met, and help us all breathe a bit easier.

Funding acknowledgment: This research was funded by the McCall MacBain Foundation.

Amanda Bryant is an energy and climate policy researcher at St. Francis Xavier University’s FluxLab, committed to using her extensive research and writing experience to meaningfully advance the energy transition. She is interested in opportunities and challenges for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the context of Canada’s oil and gas industry. She has written and published on subjects such as methane emissions underestimation and the language of “Just Transition.” She received her PhD in philosophy from the City University of New York Graduate Center in 2017.

Keep reading

While methane itself might not be toxic to humans, the marker gas that gives it the familiar smell of a "gas leak" is itself toxic.