Support journalism that lights the way through the climate crisis by June 3

Goal: $100k
$32,749

The UN Climate talks ended with a global commitment to transition away from fossil fuels and Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault celebrated Canada’s leadership role in negotiating the agreement.

Now it’s time for the federal government to recognize the full extent of its financial support for the fossil fuel industry and bring it to an end. All told, the International Monetary Fund estimates Canada subsidized fossil fuels to the tune of almost $50 billion in 2022 alone, including the cost of damage to our health and environment. Costs associated with the impacts of fossil fuel production and use will take time to reduce, but the government is handing billions of dollars over through a variety of ways, including our tax system.

Beyond grants, loans and other forms of direct financial support, Canada has subsidised our fossil fuel industries for decades through tax deductions and credits. For example, the Parliamentary Budget Office recently found that Canada lost $1.8 billion in tax revenue in 2021 by allowing deductions for fossil fuel exploration and development costs.

That is just the tip of the iceberg. Our own research found at least three other ways Canada loses revenue through tax breaks to fossil fuels.

First, the sector enjoys overly generous Capital Cost Allowances, a special business deduction for the depreciation of equipment and other assets. Since 2000, the fossil fuel sector has been one of the largest claimants of CCAs, with allowances that run 40 per cent to 70 per cent higher than the actual cost of depreciation. The bill to Canadians in terms of foregone tax revenue is $20 billion and counting.

Oil and gas corporations have also been one of the largest beneficiaries of Canada’s capital gains exclusion, which discounts the tax paid on income from assets by 50 per cent. That tax break alone has handed these companies $4.7 billion since 2010.

In addition, Canada’s oil and gas extraction industries, refineries, and pipelines have cumulatively claimed over $20 billion in tax credits in the last decade, according to our newest report.

The truth is, Canada has spent three decades attempting to use tax breaks to incentivize emissions reductions with little evidence of results.In fact, the oil and gas extraction, refining, and coal mining industries have increased their emissions intensity — the emissions per unit of production — on average between 2010 and 2020, while other sectors of the economy saw emission reductions.

Canada recently moved forward on a decade-old international commitment to ending “inefficient” subsidies for fossil fuels, releasing a framework for action in 2023. Critics rightly question what is deemed “inefficient” and what is still allowed under the new rules.

It's absurd the public does not have access to a full accounting of how our government subsidizes #fossilfuels, which are scheduled for phase-out, and which are generously enabled by our tax dollars, writes Katrina Miller @fairtaxcanada #Cdnpoli

The fossil fuel sector has been one of the most profitable in the last few years, which begs the question of why any subsidy would be considered “efficient.” It would be much more efficient to simply mandate reductions and force investment of some portion of that profit into emission reduction activities. The new cap and trade legislation announced early last fall is a good, albeit slow, start.

However, new tax credits worth billions for carbon capture and other emission reduction initiatives will be made available to fossil fuel companies, all considered “efficient” under the new framework. It’s unclear what actual proof of emission reductions is attached to the credits. There are no rules to assure funds saved through the credit aren’t just funnelled to expand production and increase the industry’s footprint.

The federal government needs to think holistically about how we support fossil fuels through the tax system, direct government funding, and other financial aid.

Despite this, having a fulsome conversation on fossil fuel supports in Canada remains difficult. This is largely due to the federal government keeping its inventory of such measures, created as part of its new subsidies framework, secret.

It's absurd that the public does not have access to a full accounting of how our government subsidizes fossil fuels, which are scheduled for phase-out, and which are generously enabled by our tax dollars.

If we want to get serious about ending our relationship with fossil fuels, we need transparency about how our government supports the industries that produce them and a real conversation about how that support ends. Otherwise, there is little chance that Canada will be able to meet the COP28 commitment it helped forge.

Katrina Miller is the executive director of the Canadians for Tax Fairness, Canada’s top experts on how progressive taxation can lead us to a just society.

Keep reading

The greenwashing carbon capture is a joke, just another excuse for the fossil fuel industry to ramp up emissions even more. The Canadian government needs to need all subsidies and no need to hand over more tax dollars for greenwashing carbon capture either to an industry that racking in excessive profits to line their pockets and their investors.

Agree. Carbon capture on a large scale is simply not feasible. It will be used by big oil in the same way that tobacco companies marketed low nicotine cigarettes and more recently vaping as a way of reducing harm from their products. We all know how that played out. Perhaps government needs fewer career politicians and more scientists who see through big oil's nonsense.

Excellent piece by a very knowledgeable author!

Perhaps the only way to stop the tax dollar gravy train to Big Oil is to remove private money donated to government. That would be only the first step. The next step would be to conduct independent cost-benefit analysis on various industry subsidies to have an accurate picture of value for money spent, and to redirect or remove subsidies that do not provide a net positive value for the common good. This step could be tied to audits of the historical effectiveness of particular subsidies to acheive stated goals.

This also leads to the question of the power of highly paid lobbyists to swing bureaucrats and ministers into their biased, self-interested camp to obtain subsidies, no matter how poorly their industry masters perform to lower emissions or diversify into renewables. This is where the government has more control than admitted -- mainly by restricting access and subsidies to those industrues willing to prove they will adhere to government's policy initiatives for climate change instead of maintaining the status quo no matter how the long term develops.

Renewables will destroy the demand for fossil fuels. Period. Today the pace is incremental. Tomorrow the pace will likely be in much bigger steps. The evidence is abundant and clear. Throwing billions in public money at a sunset industry is not a credible economic policy.

At this point, tax breaks for oil exploration and development of new oil drilling has to be the stupidest thing a government can possibly do. There was a time when you could argue that it made sense--governments give tax breaks to help desirable activity happen, finding oil and extracting it was good and even important for the economy, so OK, tax breaks. But now, it is very clear that oil exploration and development is something we REALLY DON'T WANT ANYBODY TO DO. Maybe making it illegal is a bit draconian (or maybe not), but certainly we shouldn't be PAYING companies to do it. Gah.

I very much enjoyed the capital letters Rufus!