Only 34 days day left. Please donate!

National Observer must raise $90,000 by Dec. 31 to fund investigative journalism.
Goal: 90,000
17,900

The RCMP watchdog has uncovered shortcomings with the national force's crowd-control measures, physical searches and collection of social media information while policing anti-fracking protests in New Brunswick.

In a long-awaited report issued Thursday, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP chastises the Mounties for their reluctance to take action on some of the findings and recommendations.

The commission received 21 public complaints related to the RCMP's management of protests in 2013 over shale-gas exploration by SWN Resources Canada near the town of Rexton and the Elsipogtog First Nation reserve in Kent County, as well as in various other parts of the province.

The report notes that a primary motivation for Indigenous protesters opposing the actions of SWN was their dedication to protecting land and water they considered their own, unceded to the Crown through treaty or other agreement.

A court-issued injunction limited protests and despite some progress through negotiations between the RCMP and demonstrators, the Mounties cleared an encampment on Oct. 17, 2013, sparking a melee and numerous arrests.

After reviewing the complaints and materials disclosed by the RCMP, the commission then initiated its own investigation in December 2014 to examine the issues more broadly.

The commission found considerable evidence that RCMP members "understood and applied a measured approach" in planning their operations and while interacting with protesters.

However, it also found some distressing problems.

"Several incidents or practices interfered to varying degrees with the protesters' rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly," the commission concluded.

It stressed that police may only establish "buffer zones" within parameters set by the courts. "As such, decisions to restrict access to public roadways or sites must be specific, reasonable and limited to minimize the impact on people’s rights."

The commission also found that some of the RCMP's surveillance practices and physical searches were "inconsistent with protesters' charter rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure."

The RCMP watchdog has uncovered shortcomings with the national force's crowd-control measures, physical searches and collection of social media information while policing anti-fracking protests in New Brunswick. #RCMP #AntiFracking

For example, in conducting "stop checks," RCMP members randomly stopped vehicles for a purpose other than those set out in provincial highway traffic legislation, the report says.

"Likewise, while unconfirmed reports about the presence of weapons raised a legitimate public safety concern, searching persons entering the protesters' campsite was inconsistent with the individuals' charter rights."

The commission found that RCMP policy did not provide clear guidance on handling personal information obtained from social media or other open sources, particularly in situations where no criminal activity was involved.

The watchdog recommended that RCMP policy describe what personal information from social media sites can be gathered, how it can be used, what steps should be taken to verify its reliability and limits on how long it can be kept.

It urges the RCMP to destroy such material once it is clear there is no criminal or national-security dimension.

Among the commission's other findings:

— The RCMP's interactions with SWN Resources were reasonable under the circumstances, and enforcing the law and injunctions did not amount to acting as private security for the company, as some had claimed;

— RCMP members did not differentiate between Indigenous and non-Indigenous protesters when making arrests, nor did they demonstrate bias against Indigenous protesters generally;

— Officers had reasonable grounds to arrest people for offences including mischief and obstruction, and the force used was generally necessary and proportional;

— The Mounties had legal authority to clear the campsite and it was a "reasonable exercise of their discretion" to do so, though it would have been prudent to allow more time for negotiations;

— The decision to leave members of the crisis negotiation team out of the loop about operational planning led to the "unfortunate and regrettable situation" of the tactical operation occurring shortly after RCMP negotiators offered tobacco to campsite protest leaders;

— At the time the policing efforts began, with some notable exceptions, assigned members did not have sufficient training in Indigenous cultural matters.

"Canada’s ongoing reconciliation with Indigenous people includes protecting the rights of those whose voices have been diminished by systemic sources of racism in our society," commission chairwoman Michelaine Lahaie said in a statement accompanying the report.

In her response to the report, RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki agreed to implement recommendations on sensitivity and awareness training related to Indigenous culture and sacred items, better information-sharing with crisis negotiators and refreshers for RCMP members on law and policy for search and seizure.

But while the RCMP indicated support for eight of the commission's 12 recommendations, it believed three needed no further action.

"This concerns the commission, as these included recommendations concerning roadblocks, exclusion zones and limits to police powers," the report says.

Lucki also strongly rejected recommendations limiting collection and retention of open-source information, saying the RCMP must have ready access to data about protesters, even if they have no criminal history.

The RCMP's right to refuse to implement findings or recommendations, and its statutory obligation to explain itself when it does so, is not meant to provide an opportunity for the police force to act as an appeal body with regard to the commission’s findings, the report says.

"Such a process would amount to giving the RCMP carte blanche to come to its own conclusions about its members' actions."

Earlier this week, a civil liberties group launched a court action to force the release of a complaints commission report on alleged RCMP surveillance of anti-oil protesters in British Columbia

The B.C. Civil Liberties Association says the Mounties have been sitting on an interim report for more than three years and the group is now asking the Federal Court to order Lucki to finalize her input so the watchdog can release it.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 12, 2020.

Keep reading

Another shard of shrapnel in the deconstruction battle against the national police force. Why can our government not recognize and remedy the oppressive, colonial, militaristic origins of our national police force? With this historical burden how can this police force re-imagine its own future existence as our world view evolves. The RCMP embodies the entire notion of white supremacy. It is a doomed ideology in a human species characterized by a majority of people of colour.

The glory of the British empire (and other white European colonial powers) on which the sun never sets, is fading - into the setting sun. Those of us unfortunate enough to have "no colour" will ultimately have to accept "no overwhelming power".

So the report, within its little frame, says the RCMP were not THAT bad in that they only some of the time and in some vaguely limited ways violated the rights of protestors, and weren't colluding with the oil companies so hard as to represent "acting as private security" for them. This is pretty typical.

But let's step outside the frame for a moment. Oil companies violate the law all the time. But the RCMP does not spy on the oil companies, harass its employees, limit their movement, shove the companies off of land they consider theirs, nor does it work with First Nations landlords to police oil companies operating on their land. It certainly doesn't beat up oil company executives while arresting them on trumped up charges. So, why not? Clearly we the people (particularly the indigenous ones) are not as equal as big companies who are not even citizens at all, when it comes to who the RCMP see themselves as serving.