Ordinary people have long been shut out by political and capitalist elites who have done them immense harm, the former strategist who helped Donald Trump win the White House told a protest-delayed debate in Toronto on Friday.

Denying Trump or his supporters are racist, Steve Bannon called populists the true anti-fascists because, he said, fascism looks to worship the state.

Bannon slammed what he called the "great elites of the permanent political class" for causing the devastating financial crisis in 2008 and waging endless wars like the one in Afghanistan. Those same elites consider the populist movement to be made up of racist, nativist xenophobes, he said.

"Well, it's not. They're the backbone of our country, the most decent people on Earth," Bannon said during the 90-minute debate.

Bannon's opponent, conservative commentator David Frum, conceded that liberal democracy was in trouble for many of the reasons Bannon outlined. However, he said, Trump and populism should not be the answer.

"The failures of a good system are no reason to turn to an evil one," Frum said. "We have to renew and repair."

Frum accused Bannon and Trump of using code words to incite antipathy toward Jews, blacks and immigrants — something Bannon denied.

"This is about the little guy versus the elites," Bannon said. "The little guy identifies with that, whether it's in Hungary, whether it's in Italy, whether it's in Brazil, whether it's in the United States."

Police outside the downtown auditorium made several arrests as chanting protesters slowed attendees from getting inside. Video on social media showed officers using batons to hold back the crowd, and one photo showed an officer using pepper spray. Police reported no injuries.

"I think the people of Toronto have shown how they feel about the far right," said David Langille, who was among those protesting outside. "We want to protect our democracy — it's very important."

Bannon, 64, the former executive chairman of right-wing Breitbart News, helped Trump win the 2016 presidential election and was White House chief strategist for eight months until August 2017. Critics have branded him a racist and anti-Semite, epithets he has rejected.

Frum, 58, a senior editor at The Atlantic magazine, was a speechwriter for ex-U.S. president George W. Bush. The Canadian-American is also the author of the recent book "Trumpocracy," which sharply criticizes the current American president as a threat to democracy itself.

Trump has abused the political process and the media to usurp power and is "slowly corroding" institutions, Frum said.

"Populism is not popular," Frum said. "Populism is the art of subdividing the country and excluding much of the nation from the rest of the nation in order to justify the authority of some."

The debate played out just ahead of the fiercely contested midterm congressional elections in the United States on Nov. 6. Organizers said about 2,700 people paid to attend, while perhaps as many as 10,000 more watched via livestream.

The proposition the two men debated, with Bannon in favour and Frum opposed, was: "The future of Western politics is populist, not liberal."

In his opening statement — interrupted by a shouting protester — Bannon gave a nod to the demonstrators outside for exercising their free-speech rights, before warning that society was on the verge of a "revolution."

"It's not a question of whether populism is on the rise and whether populism is going to be the political future," Bannon said, prompting derisive laughter. "The only question before us: Is it going to be populist nationalism or populist socialism?"

What Bannon and Trump are promoting is a scam and lie, Frum shot back, adding that populist leaders — including Bannon's former boss — are "crooks."

"Does the kind of politics that Steve Bannon is speaking for and President Trump articulates ... offer me anything?" Frum, who accused populists of cruelty, said to audience applause. "It offers you nothing. It does not care about you. It does not respect you."

Despite the skill of both debaters, neither proved more persuasive. At the start of the debate, 28 per cent of those in the audience indicated they were in favour of the idea that populism was the way of the future, while 72 per cent were opposed. More than half said they were open to changing their minds during the debate.

However, no one did and the final result was the same as at the start, although organizers initially recorded Bannon has having won easily. They blamed a "technical glitch."

Friday's event — part of the decade-old Munk Debates — was announced just days after Bannon was dropped from the speakers list at this month's New Yorker Festival after an intense backlash and threats of a boycott by other guests. Critics in Canada also opposed allowing him to air his views.

Despite the blow-back, the debate chairman and moderator, Rudyard Griffiths, stressed what he called the importance of allowing vigorous discussion of hot topics to allow the public to make up its own mind.

While the event was sold out, the theatre was barely half full at the scheduled start time. Organizers explained the half-hour delay by saying they wanted to ensure everyone was safe.

Audience members each paid up to $100 to attend the debate, although some resellers were asking several times the value on Friday. Aurea, the charitable foundation behind the event, says it supports public-policy organizations that, among other concepts, advance free markets and the protection of democratic values.

Keep reading

The problem of "populism" as I see it - despite Bannons specious claims of populism being the "True face" of anti-facism is a sickeningly familiar one. Here is Bannon, the product of privilege, perhaps a struggling film-maker, working out his frustrations at not achieving the heights of power and control he feels entitled to; reacting by sowing discord, using ideas and language that not only dishonour him, but that are actually intended to promote anger, discontent, and fear. Bannon, like most provocateurs, aims to stir up the emotional, unreflective reactions that arise from a sense of powerlessness, and then to bend and twist those emotions to the furtherance of his own importance. Populism can also be described as "mob rule", and as such can be as dangerous to those who provoke it as to those the mob is directed to attack.

As soon as populism engages in violence, in thought, word, and action - it becomes just another tool for oppression - perhaps temporarily at least, by just another set of power hungry individuals.

Those who refuse to examine the true history of the human race will, it seems, inevitably repeat this cycle of the rise and fall of despotic, fascist, tyrannical, kleptocratic, psychopathic systems of control. "Elites", come and go, wealth changes hands, but in some people the unquenchable quest for power, for fame, for life and death control over others is always re-born from the ashes of destruction.

Liberal democracy - despite its own manifold failures, has been the only thought system, so far, that has had any success in checking this all too human trait. Liberal democracy - is, to date, the only bastion of relatively free thought, that may, if it survives, be able to depress the pretensions of those; with wealth, mostly ill-gotten, or with grievances, mostly imaginary, who have convinced themselves they are more worthy than others to prosper, to rule, to trample the rights of the objects of their fear, scorn, despite.

In the final analysis it is always fear than drives people like Bannon. Even those who achieve all the wealth, fame and power they could ever wish for actually live in existential fear that someone else, more ruthless than they, will eventually destroy them. Their fear is misplaced, it is not someone, but somethings that will win - time and mortality.

An online Oxford Dictionary defines Populism as " a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups".
Is "Me Too" a populist movement? I'd have to say YES!